cabezadecaballo
Well-known member
I have heard as high as $400 million
2000 mules
- Thread starter I enjoy wrestling
- Start date
How about all the GOP Congressmen and Senators on the same ballot. Should we roll back all the results?
FlightCrew
Well-known member
You are making our point ….
I enjoy wrestling
Well-known member
Wow, thanks for making a good point.
Trump's candidacy brought amazing "down ballot" success. Currently, House Republicans have gained about a dozen seats, and not a single GOP incumbent lost re-election.
That's a big part of the "rigging" that took place. My understanding is he didn't like the negative reaction and criticism he got for helping deliver us Brandon and has said he isn't going to do it again. But someone else will.
The nexus between legacy media, social media, and the DNC was very successful in suppressing information, messaging for Dems, and manipulating voters. Zuckerberg's targeted get out the vote operation definitely helped.
The thing is, Trump alienated suburban women. If he hadn't done that, all this rigging wouldn't have mattered. Fortunately for him or any other presidential GOP nominee, the Dems have alienated them worse with COVID-19, CRT, and sex education policy and with inflation and kitchen table issues.
Would you like to try that statement again. Only people vote not populated land or rural land . Land does not vote people vote and a larger percentage of people voted for Trump in the two states you mentioned.
5 posts on just the first page; you must be nervous about something..........................................................truth, maybe?
I enjoy wrestling
Well-known member
Why would someone ever make that statement? That's an admission of guilt. What is he guilty of? The statistics point to malfeasance. I think Mr Zuckerberg is very aware of analysis.
BGFalcons82
Well-known member
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gray/XJMW25T7LZGKVEDP6EHP6QRHRA.jpg)
Breaking down the ‘Zuckerberg 5′ in Wisconsin election report; CTCL derides allegations
The organization behind the grants cited multiple times throughout the Wisconsin Special Counsel’s report rejected its allegations, citing legal decisions and the way the grants were awarded.
www.nbc15.com
Looks like Mule Payments ?
The CTCL’s response also indicated that, while the grants in Wisconsin ended up going to those five cities, any U.S. local election office in the country that played a role in the election could apply. It also noted that every eligible office that did apply was awarded money by the agency.
Grant Totals for ‘Zuckerberg 5′ (per CTCL)
City.................................Cash GrantGreen Bay................... $1,245,706
Kenosha.......................$862,779
Madison..................$1,271,788
Milwaukee...................$3,409,500
Racine........................... $1,699,100
gneiss rocks
Well-known member
We may never know for sure but if you follow the exposed lies by the Dem media and apply minimal logic, you will have a good idea.
The same people who were caught lying and fabricating evidence in the Trump Russia hoax are the same people who told us "immediately" that the confirmed DNC emails were a Russian hack. They absolutely refused to turn over their servers for investigation... the same people who also knew immediately Botched robery, and Julian Assange was lying... why hide, why lie, how did they immediately solve these Unsolved crimes?
Joe Biden did not get anywhere near 81 million legitimate votes; it is statistically impossible. The precise targeting of just a few cities in a few key swing states is all that was necessary to significantly inflate his vote total. As the left says, there was no massive nationwide voter fraud; partly true, because there did not need to be in order to win. All that they had to control was a dozen cities in a half dozen states, which they did.
Just about everyone knows this, even those who will not admit it.
I enjoy wrestling
Well-known member
Nope
gneiss rocks
Well-known member
No need, both controllable insiders, it did not matter to those in charge at all. Both corrupt and paid for, neither would ever expose the system.
Last edited:
BlueJayFan
Well-known member
lol
You don't have to; there was no down-ballot fraud; it was all the presidential checkmark. Those stats themselves TELL YOU that fraud occurred.
so lets get the boy robot in front of congress and ask him some questions about the money....
I don't think he has made such a statement, but has said in an interview that he isn't going to do it again. My assumption is that he sees the disaster and dumpster fire that is Brandon, and perhaps has learned his lesson.
But his efforts were, to my understanding, using data to identify urban areas to focus get-out-the-vote efforts. It helped Dems focus their resources where they could get the biggest bang. Not illegal.
The question here is one of business sense, and, possibly ethics. Should a mogul who wields power in the public information domain throw in that heavily on the political side that half of the eyeballs that use his product despise.
I've said for months that any conservative who is still on Facebook is aiding and abetting the enemy. My wife is still on. Lol.
Hard to keep all the conspiracy theories straight you guys keep changing them up and inventing new ones. So it is not voting machines or chinese paper or or or or .....
BTW- Have they filed a court challenge? RU waiting for trump to be reinstated?
I enjoy wrestling
Well-known member
He won't do what again? That's all I need to hear.
But someone else over there will. Soros, if no one else steps up.
It's too smart and too effective not to. The GOP will have some whiz kids doing it on their side, so that advantage will be gone.
FlightCrew
Well-known member
No they won’t
FlightCrew
Well-known member
Plan is to win House, Senate and then Trump win Presidency (3rd time) and bring the hammer.
U
username123
Guest
But will pubs have the guts to bring the hammer? They have had chances in the past and did nothing
I am sure you would be fine with that being it for elections. Autocracy. GO MAGA!
SayMyName
Well-known member
US documentary revives Trump's unproven election fraud claims
Former US president Donald Trump claims a recent documentary "proves a massive illegal ballot harvesting operation took place" during the 2020 election. But experts say the evidence cited in the film is circumstantial and does not support any such allegation of wrongdoing at the polls. Dozens of...
factcheck.afp.com
Fact-checking “2000 Mules,” the movie alleging ballot fraud
A film debuting in over 270 theaters across the United States this week uses a flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to cast doubt on the results of th…
www.denverpost.com
GDPR Support
www.ajc.com
‘2000 mules’ has faulty premise about 2020 mail ballots
"2000 mules," a new documentary from a right-wing filmmaker with a history of spreading false claims, promises to give e
www.politifact.com
SayMyName
Well-known member
US documentary revives Trump's unproven election fraud claims
Former US president Donald Trump claims a recent documentary "proves a massive illegal ballot harvesting operation took place" during the 2020 election. But experts say the evidence cited in the film is circumstantial and does not support any such allegation of wrongdoing at the polls. Dozens of...Fact-checking “2000 Mules,” the movie alleging ballot fraud
A film debuting in over 270 theaters across the United States this week uses a flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to cast doubt on the results of th…GDPR Support
www.ajc.com‘2000 mules’ has faulty premise about 2020 mail ballots
"2000 mules," a new documentary from a right-wing filmmaker with a history of spreading false claims, promises to give e
FlightCrew
Well-known member
Least convincing??? What?
Scientific evidence beyond shadow of a doubt.
Scientific evidence beyond shadow of a doubt.