thisisinsane
Well-known member
For sure, however, kind of like TP said, it’s impossible to account for all the “what if’s”.i call on schools, doors are not left open at least in Ohio, to get fresh air in the schools.... maybe back in the 70's and 80's but not in todays enviroment.... there is only one point of entry to get in schools now a days...
It’s been proven that if a sick individual wants to do damage, they find a way.
A couple what if scenarios that “one door entry” doesn’t solve:
-kids go in and out for activities (especially in nice weather)
- teacher gets overpowered or killed for their ID badge in parking lot
- teacher has ID stolen and doesn’t realize
-teacher subdued at home the night before
- teacher leaves for lunch, someone else comes back with their ID
-disgruntled employee already with access
- custodian killed while taking out trash midday
Now, some of the above scenarios could be handled with the one door policy, logistically is a nightmare. Most schools have FOBs or ID badges that grant employee access at most outside entrances.
Should teachers be allowed to leave for lunch? I believe most would sacrifice the ability to leave for the ultimate protection of students. However, what would a bunch of new requirements for the same pay do to the profession in the long run?
A liberal teacher may be opposed to arming teachers and such. And the more conservative teachers are already leaving the profession in droves due to liberal policies.
So who is education going to attract?
I ask all this, not opposing what you are saying, simply putting out some of the things I still see as security issues not solved by “one door” and metal detectors. I certainly believe the one door theory would help to some degree, but it would certainly take more investment of resources while asking more of teachers without increasing pay. Typically something that wouldn’t fly in the private sector but somehow it seems to be “ok” with some to ask for more yet not have a plan to compensate for it.