ROE VS WADE OVERTURNED!!!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Irwin20 said:
Washington Post reporter tried to verify this story but could not…so may be true or more BS.

Biden's story of child rape victim traveling for abortion ‘very difficult’ to prove, WaPo fact-checker says​

Kessler expressed skepticism of the 'one-source story' despite the fact that it 'quickly went viral.​

Click to expand...
I have said this before about this case. The issue here is not abortion access, its that a 10 year old was impregnated. The person responsible should be burned alive publicly
 
  • Like
Reactions: y2h
frecriss said:
I have said this before about this case. The issue here is not abortion access, its that a 10 year old was impregnated. The person responsible should be burned alive publicly
Click to expand...
I guess the question is”did this 10 year old pregnant child” even exist? I would‘t put it past the Libs to make it up.
 
Irwin20 said:
Washington Post reporter tried to verify this story but could not…so may be true or more BS.

Biden's story of child rape victim traveling for abortion ‘very difficult’ to prove, WaPo fact-checker says​

Kessler expressed skepticism of the 'one-source story' despite the fact that it 'quickly went viral.​

Click to expand...
I questioned it in post 622. They always over reach.
 
frecriss said:
I have said this before about this case. The issue here is not abortion access, its that a 10 year old was impregnated. The person responsible should be burned alive publicly
Click to expand...
I said this in post 628. Then some dope tried to defend the guy that impregnated her (if it even happened). Supporting abortions twists up people's brains.
 
I’ve said this before and believe it to be true. I was agnostic about abortion until I saw a film of a real procedure, I’d bet it would change a few minds on here as well:

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director-turned-pro-life activist Abby Johnson shared her story of how she changed her stance on abortion Sunday, telling "Fox & Friends Weekend" host Rachel Campos-Duffy that many people would oppose abortion if they saw its "barbarity." Johnson also said the victim of abortion is often removed from the equation since many pro-choice activists have never seen the procedure performed.
 
Irwin20 said:
I’ve said this before and believe it to be true. I was agnostic about abortion until I saw a film of a real procedure, I’d bet it would change a few minds on here as well:

Former Planned Parenthood clinic director-turned-pro-life activist Abby Johnson shared her story of how she changed her stance on abortion Sunday, telling "Fox & Friends Weekend" host Rachel Campos-Duffy that many people would oppose abortion if they saw its "barbarity." Johnson also said the victim of abortion is often removed from the equation since many pro-choice activists have never seen the procedure performed.
Click to expand...
It's murder imo. Who decides when it's not a human? So many, so eager to murder. Have at it imo. God will sort it out.
 
Last edited:
I enjoy wrestling said:
How can this be allowed. Wouldn't it be terrible if the tables were turned. Someone needs to provide information on the protesters. This sht would stop in a hurry
www.breitbart.com

Leftists Offer Reward for Location of SCOTUS Justices

A leftist group is offering rewards for people to report the wherabouts of specific Supreme Court Justices, according to the New York Post.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
Click to expand...
We will see in January 2025 if a conservative AG will tolerate. My guess is no
 
www.washingtonexaminer.com

Don't let post-Roe hysteria twist the truth

Beginning in 1968, while campaigning to repeal all state abortion laws, a prominent abortionist named Bernard Nathanson fabricated statistics and made up false stories to advance his cause. His aim was to frame the abortion debate to make it seem like compassion positively demanded legalization.
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
 
my2sense said:
A 10 year old is pregnant? If true (which I have some doubt about), hopefully whoever is supposed to be caring for her will be going to jail as well as whomever impregnated her.
Click to expand...
This from July 2nd. Even tho boob and TP questioned this and played "what if", I still think the "father" needs punished. The fact that he is a 27 yr old illegal just cements my point.
 

In the days after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, did you hear that former Vice President Mike Pence had called for a national ban on abortion?

So did I.

That’s why I was all set to write a column lambasting Pence for taking an unconstitutional approach to the abortion issue. After all, one of the repeated arguments against Roe v. Wade was that the Constitution is silent on abortion, and that therefore the issue should be returned to the states for their individual decisions.

But then I decided to look up the dangerous pronouncement by Pence, and I discovered that he never called for a national ban on abortion. It was just more fake news from the mainstream media.

What Pence actually said on his Twitter account was this:

“Having been given this second chance for Life, we must not rest and must not relent until the sanctity of life is restored to the center of American law in every state in the land.”

In other words, he was imploring his fellow citizens not to be satisfied with abortion bans in Republican states, but to fight in every state to convince legislators that the life of the unborn is precious.


That is the appropriate battlefield for the post-Dobbs debate about abortion because if, as liberals have been telling us for the last 50 years, abortion is a health issue, then the federal government has no business writing laws about it.

Unfortunately, President Biden and the Democrats don’t understand that basic principle. Biden has gone so far as to demand that Congress enshrine the principles of Roe v. Wade by passing federal legislation to protect abortion rights nationwide.

“I believe we have to codify Roe v. Wade into law. And the way to do that is to make sure Congress votes to do that,” Biden told reporters in Spain last month.

But Congress has no such ability.

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution enumerates the powers of Congress. They are remarkably straightforward – and limited. Raise taxes, borrow money, regulate international commerce and commerce among the states, establish a process for naturalizing citizens, coin money and punish counterfeiters, establish post offices, establish copyright and trademark laws, establish lower courts, regulate pirates, declare war, raise armies and a navy, provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions, and create and maintain a small district that shall be the seat of government.

In essence, that’s it.

And yet somehow now the Congress of the United States has the power to establish a massive bureaucracy to sell and regulate health insurance, control pollution, intimidate business, spend billions of dollars on something called COVID relief, send billions more dollars to Ukraine and other nations around the world, and of course if Democrats have their way, assume total and complete control over how elections are run. These are just a few examples of an out-of-control Congress that hasn’t obeyed the limitations of the Constitution for well over a hundred years, probably more.

Abortion is a perfect illustration of how the courts, Congress, and the executive branch have all conspired to change, without amendment, the very nature of our country from a loose collection of states held together by the need for a common defense to a monolithic dictatorship. Regulation of health services such as abortion is reserved to the states, not to the federal bureaucracy. That’s because the Constitution does not give Congress any authority on health issues, and the Tenth Amendment says that unenumerated rights are retained by the states and the people.

Remember, before 1973 there was no constitutional right to have an abortion at all. That right was discovered by the Supreme Court in 1973 as part of a “penumbra” of privacy that had been “divined” in the Constitution a few years earlier, even though it had evaded discovery for the previous 175 years. Now that Roe has been overturned, it doesn’t mean that abortion has been outlawed, as some alarmists would have you believe. Rather, it simply returns the right to regulate this medical procedure to the states, where it had always been handled before 1973.

Democrats are unhappy with that solution because they know that many states, perhaps a majority of them, will not approve of legal abortion. They claim that Republicans or the Supreme Court are trying to thwart democracy, but it is Democrats who don’t want voters to decide.

The question that needs to be posed to all the left-wing politicians and protesters lamenting a world without Roe v. Wade is, “Which is more important – the Constitution or the right to abortion?”

If it is the Constitution, then Democrats have a way to respond to Roe v. Wade being overturned, namely, through constitutional amendment or through laws passed in the individual states. But if abortion is more important to Democrats than the Constitution, then God help us.
 
SayMyName said:

In the days after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, did you hear that former Vice President Mike Pence had called for a national ban on abortion?

So did I.

That’s why I was all set to write a column lambasting Pence for taking an unconstitutional approach to the abortion issue. After all, one of the repeated arguments against Roe v. Wade was that the Constitution is silent on abortion, and that therefore the issue should be returned to the states for their individual decisions.

But then I decided to look up the dangerous pronouncement by Pence, and I discovered that he never called for a national ban on abortion. It was just more fake news from the mainstream media.

What Pence actually said on his Twitter account was this:

“Having been given this second chance for Life, we must not rest and must not relent until the sanctity of life is restored to the center of American law in every state in the land.”

In other words, he was imploring his fellow citizens not to be satisfied with abortion bans in Republican states, but to fight in every state to convince legislators that the life of the unborn is precious.


That is the appropriate battlefield for the post-Dobbs debate about abortion because if, as liberals have been telling us for the last 50 years, abortion is a health issue, then the federal government has no business writing laws about it.

Unfortunately, President Biden and the Democrats don’t understand that basic principle. Biden has gone so far as to demand that Congress enshrine the principles of Roe v. Wade by passing federal legislation to protect abortion rights nationwide.

“I believe we have to codify Roe v. Wade into law. And the way to do that is to make sure Congress votes to do that,” Biden told reporters in Spain last month.

But Congress has no such ability.

Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution enumerates the powers of Congress. They are remarkably straightforward – and limited. Raise taxes, borrow money, regulate international commerce and commerce among the states, establish a process for naturalizing citizens, coin money and punish counterfeiters, establish post offices, establish copyright and trademark laws, establish lower courts, regulate pirates, declare war, raise armies and a navy, provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions, and create and maintain a small district that shall be the seat of government.

In essence, that’s it.

And yet somehow now the Congress of the United States has the power to establish a massive bureaucracy to sell and regulate health insurance, control pollution, intimidate business, spend billions of dollars on something called COVID relief, send billions more dollars to Ukraine and other nations around the world, and of course if Democrats have their way, assume total and complete control over how elections are run. These are just a few examples of an out-of-control Congress that hasn’t obeyed the limitations of the Constitution for well over a hundred years, probably more.

Abortion is a perfect illustration of how the courts, Congress, and the executive branch have all conspired to change, without amendment, the very nature of our country from a loose collection of states held together by the need for a common defense to a monolithic dictatorship. Regulation of health services such as abortion is reserved to the states, not to the federal bureaucracy. That’s because the Constitution does not give Congress any authority on health issues, and the Tenth Amendment says that unenumerated rights are retained by the states and the people.

Remember, before 1973 there was no constitutional right to have an abortion at all. That right was discovered by the Supreme Court in 1973 as part of a “penumbra” of privacy that had been “divined” in the Constitution a few years earlier, even though it had evaded discovery for the previous 175 years. Now that Roe has been overturned, it doesn’t mean that abortion has been outlawed, as some alarmists would have you believe. Rather, it simply returns the right to regulate this medical procedure to the states, where it had always been handled before 1973.

Democrats are unhappy with that solution because they know that many states, perhaps a majority of them, will not approve of legal abortion. They claim that Republicans or the Supreme Court are trying to thwart democracy, but it is Democrats who don’t want voters to decide.

The question that needs to be posed to all the left-wing politicians and protesters lamenting a world without Roe v. Wade is, “Which is more important – the Constitution or the right to abortion?”

If it is the Constitution, then Democrats have a way to respond to Roe v. Wade being overturned, namely, through constitutional amendment or through laws passed in the individual states. But if abortion is more important to Democrats than the Constitution, then God help us.
Click to expand...
I kind of think he is doing the same thing the left did initially. Pence’s comment could be taken either way - he could very well mean national abortion, he could very well mean let’s hope all states ban it at the state level.

Instead of all this fake news and speculation - why hasn’t anyone asked him to clarify? Easier said than done sure but it would cut out a lot of this fake news if the media would ask for clarifications instead of trying to interpret everything said with their own biases and agendas at play.
 
Orin Swift said:
I kind of think he is doing the same thing the left did initially. Pence’s comment could be taken either way - he could very well mean national abortion, he could very well mean let’s hope all states ban it at the state level.

Instead of all this fake news and speculation - why hasn’t anyone asked him to clarify? Easier said than done sure but it would cut out a lot of this fake news if the media would ask for clarifications instead of trying to interpret everything said with their own biases and agendas at play.
Click to expand...
Totally agree but fake news allows the narrative to be controlled. I'm sure if they asked him what he meant, they'd spin it regardless. ?‍♂️
 
SayMyName said:
www.washingtonexaminer.com

Warren's war on women's choice

The Left really needs to make up its mind about which lie it wants to stick with on abortion.
www.washingtonexaminer.com www.washingtonexaminer.com
Click to expand...
1658239745612.png
 
my2sense said:
A 10 year old is pregnant? If true (which I have some doubt about), hopefully whoever is supposed to be caring for her will be going to jail as well as whomever impregnated her.
my2sense said:
This from July 2nd. Even tho boob and TP questioned this and played "what if", I still think the "father" needs punished. The fact that he is a 27 yr old illegal just cements my point.
Click to expand...
Really nonsense? You questioned the possibility of a ten year old being pregnant. You gotten taken to task on your goofy statements again.
Show where anybody said the low life shouldn't be punished. You are such a hypocrite I doubt you even believe half the things you say.
Lying Simon Rex GIF by Simon Rex / Dirt Nasty
 
Interesting that other religions are fighting for abortions by using religious rights. Freedom of religion?
Religions don't agree on abortion. That's why some faiths plan to …
"Some activists devastated by the Supreme Court's decision ending a constitutional right to abortion are turning to a new tactic: to bring God on to their side of the fight.

They're planning to file religious-freedom lawsuits, hoping to use either state or federal courts to reinstate their rights, which they say are being violated by conservative Christians who've forced their theocracy upon others as a de facto national religion in the fight against abortion rights."
 
my2sense said:
I wasn't doubting the age of fertility dope, I was doubting the veracity of this particular story and its source and the timing of it.
Click to expand...
Perspectives: Evidence Proves The Heartbreaking Case Of The 10 …
my2sense said:
I believe the age of consent in Ohio is 13
Click to expand...
Leave it to nonsense to want to know what the age of consent is.

Biden's story of child rape victim traveling for abortion ‘very difficult’ to prove, WaPo fact-checker says​

Kessler expressed skepticism of the 'one-source story' despite the fact that it 'quickly went viral.​

Click to expand...
I questioned it in post 622. They always over reach.
my2sense said:
I said this in post 628. Then some dope tried to defend the guy that impregnated her (if it even happened).
Click to expand...
Eat crow again nonsense. You aren't very good at this.
 
You can tell when boob is frustrated. Endless posts and memes that no one reads.
I know it was an "L" for you pro choicers but relax. People are still killing fetuses everyday.
 
my2sense said:
You can tell when boob is frustrated. Endless posts and memes that no one reads.
I know it was an "L" for you pro choicers but relax. People are still killing fetuses everyday.
Click to expand...
Oh wait nonsense. Remember when you posted you approved of abortions for rape, incest and to save the mother's life. Just like me and several others on here? I guess that would make you prochoice too. Apparently it is hard to keep your stories straight when you are a professional hypocrite.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top