DonCalipari
Well-known member
You're absolutely right.I'm sure you're DBs WOULDN"T play 10 yrds. off their receivers and give them the game, by allowing them to pass at will!!!
You're absolutely right.I'm sure you're DBs WOULDN"T play 10 yrds. off their receivers and give them the game, by allowing them to pass at will!!!
I agree. Massillon looked at them as a Fed league team & thought they would run through them. WW sees Green beat Massillon and understands this is a tough opponent
All I can say is WW has a very good defensive game plan.I'm sure your DBs WOULDN"T play 10 yrds. off their receivers and give them the game, by allowing them to pass at will!!!
I'm sure your DBs WOULDN"T play 10 yrds. off their receivers and give them the game, by allowing them to pass at will!!!
Well maybe Green shouldn't even show up and move WW to the championship game. Sound like any other Whiney lil beach you've heard, lol. Green will need to play much better imo. To say they have no running game isn't quite correct either. I've said all along they have no real running back and sending their 155 pound receiver in motion for handoffs has worked Ok for them, the QB keepers has worked also. Also, we'll take a 5 yard average on receptions all day long!31 of 57 for 276 isn't exactly at will. Minus 1 long gain which the db in position tried to strip instead of tackle they averaged less than 5 yards per. I don't doubt WW has a better secondary, and they will also do a better job pressuring the QB. Our line is better run defenders. Green has no running game.
Obviously also, no disrespect to Green, but officiating was a major factor. Pretty safe to say WW won't be penalized 20 times for 180. Back to back to back holding, multiple dubious pass interferences, etc. I don't know if WW has any say whatsoever, but if so it is inconceivable to me that crew would even be asked (hope not) let alone okayed.
(btw that does not include the handful that got declined, lol). It was brutal.
watching the game and then verifying on film, the majority of the calls were terrible in ALL 3 playoff games. I can admit WW had 2 unnecessary roughness calls vs Piqua (stupid plays) but the Piqua game was totally called one sided. I credit WW for playing through it.31 of 57 for 276 isn't exactly at will. Minus 1 long gain which the db in position tried to strip instead of tackle they averaged less than 5 yards per. I don't doubt WW has a better secondary, and they will also do a better job pressuring the QB. Our line is better run defenders. Green has no running game.
Obviously also, no disrespect to Green, but officiating was a major factor. Pretty safe to say WW won't be penalized 20 times for 180. Back to back to back holding, multiple dubious pass interferences, etc. I don't know if WW has any say whatsoever, but if so it is inconceivable to me that crew would even be asked (hope not) let alone okayed.
(btw that does not include the handful that got declined, lol). It was brutal.
It must have been heartbreakingJust like the 20,000 Massillon Fans that came and watched the Tigers get a running clock going in the regional finals!
31 of 57 for 276 isn't exactly at will. Minus 1 long gain which the db in position tried to strip instead of tackle they averaged less than 5 yards per. I don't doubt WW has a better secondary, and they will also do a better job pressuring the QB. Our line is better run defenders. Green has no running game.
Obviously also, no disrespect to Green, but officiating was a major factor. Pretty safe to say WW won't be penalized 20 times for 180. Back to back to back holding, multiple dubious pass interferences, etc. I don't know if WW has any say whatsoever, but if so it is inconceivable to me that crew would even be asked (hope not) let alone okayed.
(btw that does not include the handful that got declined, lol). It was brutal.
If you need to hold, interfere with our receivers, PF, sideline interference, etc. then to say none of them ever happened is sad, or just the ones you want to pick happened. You lost, if Green gets blown out then so be it. Your kids need more discipline, I guarantee Massillon is the biggest smack talker we played and that was a problem for you last year as well....coaching!When your dbs play 10 yrds. off the receivers (if that was the case), you're allowing that them to complete passes at will and control the clock.
To ignore the turn over (fumble) and clearly missed PI call on the pass play, in the end zone, along with 20 total penalties and try and say Green outplayed Massillon (a 3 td favorite), well, we'll see if Winton Woods performance reflects being outplayed in a similar manner?
No. The difference is the WW Head coach got hired late spring. Hired a brand new staff, new schemes on both sides of the ball. Coaches knowing what players to trust on the field and the kids buying into the new system. Just an adjustment period.With a quick glance at WW's sched you can see a little bit of a parallel with Massillon in that there are some eeked out wins over some iffy competition and moral losses to really good teams. The difference between WW and Massillon is that WW had a much tougher road in the playoffs and came out and won against some of those same teams. So #1 for Green above all else better be ball control -- they cannot turn it over like they did in the regional final cause WW seems battle tested right now.
Anything can happen. Go Green!
All true.No. The difference is the WW Head coach got hired late spring. Hired a brand new staff, new schemes on both sides of the ball. Coaches knowing what players to trust on the field and the kids buying into the new system. Just an adjustment period.
Fair enough, my statement wasn't meant to be all-encompassing. Only fly in the ointment is a very uninspiring game against Loveland week ten, but I don't know the circumstances behind it.No. The difference is the WW Head coach got hired late spring. Hired a brand new staff, new schemes on both sides of the ball. Coaches knowing what players to trust on the field and the kids buying into the new system. Just an adjustment period.
When you need a fumble then a PI penalty, where the replay clearly shows there was no contact, you need to drop the tired argument that it was simply complaining about the refs.Massillon touchdown drives:
10 yards off of a backwards pass (bad call).
30 yard drive off of a turnover.
35 yard drive off of a turnover.
10 yard drive off a turnover (field goal).
Massillon can't throw the football.
No sustained drives.
Massillon was outplayed.
I doubt Green has been hit like WW will and with the QB running and an empty backfield, as a main part of their offense, that will definitely be a factor in the game!Looks like WW has gained about an extra 10,000 fans lol here's the skinny. Watching film this green team is tough. This Tre Martin kid is a problem. I expect Matthews & Calhoun to take turns on him. The key is can they handle WW speed off the edges. I expect a heavy screen game but since Anderson every team has to tried to emulate their gameplan, screens & QB draws. However against Anderson we were down our ALL LEAGUE DEFENSIVE TACKLE, THE SIGNAL CALLER, AND THE OFFENSIVE COORDINATOR, WHILE ONLY PRACTICING 1 DAY THAT WEEK. This team has overcome a lot of things & I expect them to have laser focus. I think WW not having kids go both ways will factor in a lot.
Tht ball will come quick. They have a 6'5 200 lb offensive tackle. He will be matched up vs the Defensive player of the yr in the SW region.I doubt Green has been hit like WW will and with the QB running and an empty backfield, as a main part of their offense, that will definitely be a factor in the game!
It’s all good. Looking forward to the game on Friday. If you get this far, your team has to be good! I hope we can keep you offense off the field!!Fair enough, my statement wasn't meant to be all-encompassing. Only fly in the ointment is a very uninspiring game against Loveland week ten, but I don't know the circumstances behind it.
Best of luck to both squads, Go Bulldogs!
So in your post arguing that Massillon was not outplayed, you decide to post a stat showing that Green ran more plays and had more yards of total offense than Massillon did?GREEN MASS
TOTAL OFFENSE PLAYS-YARDS..... 83-330 57-265
WW fans - don't be deceived by Massillon fans whining and excuse making. Green was the better team that night. Green outplayed and outcoached Massillon all night. The number of penalties was not about the poor officiating but rather the poor play of the Tigers. I understand that part of being a fan is bias toward your team but Massillon was a 24 point favorite and Green beat them. Don't sleep on Green like Massillon did.31 of 57 for 276 isn't exactly at will. Minus 1 long gain which the db in position tried to strip instead of tackle they averaged less than 5 yards per. I don't doubt WW has a better secondary, and they will also do a better job pressuring the QB. Our line is better run defenders. Green has no running game.
Obviously also, no disrespect to Green, but officiating was a major factor. Pretty safe to say WW won't be penalized 20 times for 180. Back to back to back holding, multiple dubious pass interferences, etc. I don't know if WW has any say whatsoever, but if so it is inconceivable to me that crew would even be asked (hope not) let alone okayed.
(btw that does not include the handful that got declined, lol). It was brutal.
You said Massillon would hit him all night too. They failed. Time will tell.I doubt Green has been hit like WW will and with the QB running and an empty backfield, as a main part of their offense, that will definitely be a factor in the game!
No sorryGreen is a good team but the woods will roll them by 2 td to face hoban