Yappi Sports - THE Ohio Prep Sports Authority  

Go Back   Yappi Sports - THE Ohio Prep Sports Authority > General Sports > College Football

Hello Guest!
Take a minute to register, It's 100% FREE! What are you waiting for?
Register Now
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 09-22-18, 12:55 PM
ronnie mund ronnie mund is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-13
Posts: 8,111
ronnie mund can only hope to improve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crusaders View Post
Rutgers may not win another game this decade.
Agreed. Adding them to the B10 was a terrible idea.

Divisional realignment needs to happen.
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #92  
Old 09-22-18, 10:43 PM
cjb56 cjb56 is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 06-15-04
Location: Avon, OH
Posts: 14,134
cjb56 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwwarrior09 View Post
I have zero confidence in Iowa and Ferentz. Every year they're either world beaters or a 7-5 team. With how Wisconsin looked yesterday, I think this is going to be a year where a 3-4 loss team wins the west.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
I was hoping against hope that Ferentz could get Iowa to make some noise when the league really needed it, but he couldnít...as usual.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 09-23-18, 07:17 AM
Michael Bluth Michael Bluth is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 05-29-11
Location: The Mailroom
Posts: 16,903
Michael Bluth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronnie mund View Post
Agreed. Adding them to the B10 was a terrible idea.

Divisional realignment needs to happen.
I donít want them to realign though, because I want to play MSU, Penn State, and M*chigan every year. Those games should always be on Ohio Stateís schedule.

Scott Frost needs to work miracles at Nebraska. Itís the only way to help the West
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 09-23-18, 07:17 AM
Michael Bluth Michael Bluth is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 05-29-11
Location: The Mailroom
Posts: 16,903
Michael Bluth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjb56 View Post
I was hoping against hope that Ferentz could get Iowa to make some noise when the league really needed it, but he couldnít...as usual.
Weíre better off with Wisconsin winning that game. Iowa would have lost three others at some point
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 09-23-18, 07:30 AM
Michael Bluth Michael Bluth is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 05-29-11
Location: The Mailroom
Posts: 16,903
Michael Bluth is on a distinguished road
Maryland and Rutgers, as individual football teams, add zero value to the Big Ten (negative value actually). BUT, I would be curious to see the recruiting numbers for other Big Ten schools and whether they have improved recruiting in those two areas (Jersey, New York, DC, Maryland). I’m inclined to believe that they have. The additional revenue the TV markets bring to the conference also helps indirectly as all of the schools end up with bigger football budgets for recruiting trips and paying coaches. I don’t know if you’ve noticed but the Big Ten has massively narrowed the gap in coaching talent over the past decade.

If you net it all out, I think the value is positive and probably better than adding Missouri would have been. (Though obviously not in the same ballpark as adding an A&M or Notre Dame)
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 09-23-18, 07:52 AM
nwwarrior09 nwwarrior09 is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-09
Location: Springfield/Dayton
Posts: 7,162
nwwarrior09 is on a distinguished road
The ultimate issue that the West has is limited recruiting territory. In their states and larger markets, there's either next to no talent or basketball reigns as king over football. There are are very few legit power 5 football players in Nebraska and Iowa, and basketball reigns supreme in Chicago, the Twin Cities, and Indianapolis. Greater Chicago is decent in terms of recruiting, but no where near good enough for Wisconsin, Northwestern and Illinois to load their rosters after Ohio State, Michigan and Notre Dame cherry pick the elite talent.

I think that the coaching is pretty solid with Frost, Chryst, Fitzgerald, Fleck and even Ferentz, but that doesn't solve how they find legit power 5 recruits nationally and convince them to go to non-premier destinations or football schools.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 09-23-18, 08:08 AM
nwwarrior09 nwwarrior09 is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-09
Location: Springfield/Dayton
Posts: 7,162
nwwarrior09 is on a distinguished road
The Big Ten shouldn't realign IMO. They are better off loading up one division and hoping one team runs the table on the other side.

In the big picture, if they ever expand again one (or both) of Notre Dame, Oklahoma and/or somebody else will be added over there with Purdue sliding to the East. That's the only way this will ever balance out.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 09-24-18, 08:50 AM
14Red 14Red is online now
All World
 
Join Date: 03-12-12
Posts: 4,482
14Red is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronnie mund View Post
Agreed. Adding them to the B10 was a terrible idea.

Divisional realignment needs to happen.
How about eliminating down to 10 teams again, and having a 9 game conference schedule.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 09-24-18, 12:11 PM
Sig Hansen Sig Hansen is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: not Cleveland
Posts: 17,674
Sig Hansen can only hope to improve
Former LaSalle and current Northwestern RB Jeremy Larkin is quitting football due to cervical stenosis diagnosis. That really sucks
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 09-24-18, 12:15 PM
ronnie mund ronnie mund is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-13
Posts: 8,111
ronnie mund can only hope to improve
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Red View Post
How about eliminating down to 10 teams again, and having a 9 game conference schedule.
No, because that's the complete opposite direction in which college football is headed.
Reply With Quote
  #101  
Old 09-24-18, 12:21 PM
El Indio El Indio is offline
All American
 
Join Date: 06-04-09
Posts: 2,163
El Indio is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Bluth View Post
Maryland and Rutgers, as individual football teams, add zero value to the Big Ten (negative value actually). BUT, I would be curious to see the recruiting numbers for other Big Ten schools and whether they have improved recruiting in those two areas (Jersey, New York, DC, Maryland). I’m inclined to believe that they have. The additional revenue the TV markets bring to the conference also helps indirectly as all of the schools end up with bigger football budgets for recruiting trips and paying coaches. I don’t know if you’ve noticed but the Big Ten has massively narrowed the gap in coaching talent over the past decade.

If you net it all out, I think the value is positive and probably better than adding Missouri would have been. (Though obviously not in the same ballpark as adding an A&M or Notre Dame)
Why are you grouping Maryland with Rutgers? Maryland had done quite well in the Big Ten (against non power houses). Not to mention knocking off Texas the last two years. Here I thought you had merit on Yappi. jk, LOL!
Reply With Quote
  #102  
Old 09-24-18, 02:27 PM
14Red 14Red is online now
All World
 
Join Date: 03-12-12
Posts: 4,482
14Red is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronnie mund View Post
No, because that's the complete opposite direction in which college football is headed.
Let's call it what it is...the two divisions, more teams in a conference was born to keep the conferences best teams from playing each other, setting up a conference championship game and making a ton of money. Has nothing to do with finding out who the best teams are.

My grand plan would be to split D1 college football into a grouping of 64 schools. 8, 8 team divisions based on regions. You win the division, you have a spot in the 8 team playoff. You can schedule 10 games, you play 7 division teams then you can schedule whomever you want, but they have to be within the 64 team pool.

I think this would eliminate alot of the subjective issues with deciding who can get into the playoff. Many, many more common opponents, no cupcakes.

A midwest region may look like this...

Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Kentucky, Louisville and say...West Virgina.
Reply With Quote
  #103  
Old 09-24-18, 03:29 PM
nwwarrior09 nwwarrior09 is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-09
Location: Springfield/Dayton
Posts: 7,162
nwwarrior09 is on a distinguished road
I actually don't hate that idea. The only issue I see is that there would theoretically be a few loaded regions (Big Ten East + Notre Dame, SEC/ACC in the southeast, Big XII + SEC West centered around Texas), while a couple of regions are guaranteed to suck, such as a region that would probably have Penn State, Pitt, Rutgers, UConn, Boston College, Maryland, Virginia and Virginia Tech.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #104  
Old 09-25-18, 10:31 AM
Michael Bluth Michael Bluth is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 05-29-11
Location: The Mailroom
Posts: 16,903
Michael Bluth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Indio View Post
Why are you grouping Maryland with Rutgers? Maryland had done quite well in the Big Ten (against non power houses). Not to mention knocking off Texas the last two years. Here I thought you had merit on Yappi. jk, LOL!
Respective records by year, since joining the Big Ten, of the two teams mentioned:

Team 1:
8-5 (3-5 conference)
4-8 (1-7 conference)
2-10 (0-9 conference)
4-8 (3-6 conference)

Team 2:
7-6 (4-4 conference)
3-9 (1-7 conference)
6-7 (3-6 conference)
4-8 (2-7 conference)
Reply With Quote
  #105  
Old 09-25-18, 10:58 AM
Auggie's Avatar
Auggie Auggie is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 10-02-02
Location: The Other Side
Posts: 13,682
Auggie is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Red View Post
Let's call it what it is...the two divisions, more teams in a conference was born to keep the conferences best teams from playing each other, setting up a conference championship game and making a ton of money. Has nothing to do with finding out who the best teams are.

My grand plan would be to split D1 college football into a grouping of 64 schools. 8, 8 team divisions based on regions. You win the division, you have a spot in the 8 team playoff. You can schedule 10 games, you play 7 division teams then you can schedule whomever you want, but they have to be within the 64 team pool.

I think this would eliminate alot of the subjective issues with deciding who can get into the playoff. Many, many more common opponents, no cupcakes.

A midwest region may look like this...

Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Kentucky, Louisville and say...West Virgina.
I posted this type of frame work on numerous threads in the past. The one thing you have to do is keep 4 of the 5 conference alignments due to tradition and make the conference title games the defacto 1st round so they keep that revenue stream to fund the fencing and rowing teams and keep the schools title IX compliant. I did talk to a sports marketing person that said the one thing NCAA football needs to do to leverage revenue is look into getting a non Power 5 team into the playoffs, along with gambling it is the oxygen of the Billion $ basketball tourney.
Reply With Quote
  #106  
Old 09-25-18, 11:49 AM
El Indio El Indio is offline
All American
 
Join Date: 06-04-09
Posts: 2,163
El Indio is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Bluth View Post
Respective records by year, since joining the Big Ten, of the two teams mentioned:

Team 1:
8-5 (3-5 conference)
4-8 (1-7 conference)
2-10 (0-9 conference)
4-8 (3-6 conference)

Team 2:
7-6 (4-4 conference)
3-9 (1-7 conference)
6-7 (3-6 conference)
4-8 (2-7 conference)
At least MD beat Texas.
But I do agree that Rutgers is just terrible.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 09-25-18, 03:45 PM
Max Grumbleman Max Grumbleman is offline
All Ohio
 
Join Date: 06-11-16
Posts: 547
Max Grumbleman is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Red View Post
Let's call it what it is...the two divisions, more teams in a conference was born to keep the conferences best teams from playing each other, setting up a conference championship game and making a ton of money. Has nothing to do with finding out who the best teams are.

My grand plan would be to split D1 college football into a grouping of 64 schools. 8, 8 team divisions based on regions. You win the division, you have a spot in the 8 team playoff. You can schedule 10 games, you play 7 division teams then you can schedule whomever you want, but they have to be within the 64 team pool.

I think this would eliminate alot of the subjective issues with deciding who can get into the playoff. Many, many more common opponents, no cupcakes.

A midwest region may look like this...

Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Kentucky, Louisville and say...West Virgina.
Awhile ago, I played around with the idea of a promotion/relegation system for college football as a way to improve the season while keeping the current FBS teams in the loop. I settled on a 3-tier system (called the College Football Series) in which teams could move between tiers based on performance (on-field and attendance) over a 4-year period. I based the tiers on competitiveness, market size, and stadium capacity:

Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 09-25-18, 05:33 PM
Arrogate Arrogate is online now
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 12-27-16
Location: Irish Buffalo's head
Posts: 6,364
Arrogate will become famous soon enough
In your scenario would there be a playoff based on division winners? If so would Tier 2 teams have a chance to compete for a National Championship or would they have to be in Tier 1?

How would scheduling work in this scenario? Would they be free to schedule who they want or would teams be forced to play those in their division/tier?

Obviously this is all fictional and likely to never happen but it would be cool if this forced teams to play against competitive teams instead of 4 OOC games against cupcakes and FCS schools
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 09-26-18, 12:29 PM
Max Grumbleman Max Grumbleman is offline
All Ohio
 
Join Date: 06-11-16
Posts: 547
Max Grumbleman is on a distinguished road
Each Tier would have its own playoff and champion.

Tier 1 wouldn't be permitted to schedule teams below Tier 2, and Tier 2 wouldn't be allowed to schedule FCS.

For Tier 1, I envisioned a 13-game schedule comprised of 7 divisional games, 2 inter-divisional games, 3 inter-conference games (one team each from the other conferences), and 1 Tier 2 game. For example:

Ohio State
Navy
Penn State
Ole Miss
Arizona State
Indiana
Wisconsin
Purdue
BYE
Kansas State
Northwestern
Notre Dame
Michigan State
Illinois
Michigan
Conference Final
Semi-Final
Championship

Conference Finals would be the first round of the playoff, and the semi-final would be reseeded by record. The season would be more or less the same length, but with a shorter gap between the regular and post-season.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 09-26-18, 07:09 PM
EagleGuy EagleGuy is offline
All World
 
Join Date: 06-26-16
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 2,697
EagleGuy is on a distinguished road
No Wake Forest.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 09-26-18, 10:52 PM
Max Grumbleman Max Grumbleman is offline
All Ohio
 
Join Date: 06-11-16
Posts: 547
Max Grumbleman is on a distinguished road
Sorry, EagleGuy! They were one of the last cut! Good market, good stadium, but just a bit lacking competitively!

Just for kicks, a Tier 2 schedule would be 13 games comprised of 7 divisional games, 3 intra-conference games, two Tier 2 games, and one Tier 3 game. Example:

Wake Forest
Duke [T1]
Virginia Tech [T1]
James Madison [T3]
Arkansas State [D]
East Carolina [D]
Air Force [IC]
BYE
Marshall [D]
Fresno State [IC]
Southern Miss. [D]
Tulane [D]
Rutgers [IC]
Vanderbilt [D]
USF [D]
Semi-Final
Championship
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-27-18, 11:55 AM
nutsnbolts nutsnbolts is offline
All Region
 
Join Date: 11-17-11
Posts: 339
nutsnbolts is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14Red View Post
Let's call it what it is...the two divisions, more teams in a conference was born to keep the conferences best teams from playing each other, setting up a conference championship game and making a ton of money. Has nothing to do with finding out who the best teams are.

My grand plan would be to split D1 college football into a grouping of 64 schools. 8, 8 team divisions based on regions. You win the division, you have a spot in the 8 team playoff. You can schedule 10 games, you play 7 division teams then you can schedule whomever you want, but they have to be within the 64 team pool.

I think this would eliminate alot of the subjective issues with deciding who can get into the playoff. Many, many more common opponents, no cupcakes.

A midwest region may look like this...



Ohio State, Michigan, Michigan State, Wisconsin, Notre Dame, Kentucky, Louisville and say...West Virgina.
So you are obviously in favor of no more than one team from any conference right now.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-27-18, 05:19 PM
EagleGuy EagleGuy is offline
All World
 
Join Date: 06-26-16
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 2,697
EagleGuy is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Grumbleman View Post
Sorry, EagleGuy! They were one of the last cut! Good market, good stadium, but just a bit lacking competitively!

Just for kicks, a Tier 2 schedule would be 13 games comprised of 7 divisional games, 3 intra-conference games, two Tier 2 games, and one Tier 3 game. Example:

Wake Forest
Duke [T1]
Virginia Tech [T1]
James Madison [T3]
Arkansas State [D]
East Carolina [D]
Air Force [IC]
BYE
Marshall [D]
Fresno State [IC]
Southern Miss. [D]
Tulane [D]
Rutgers [IC]
Vanderbilt [D]
USF [D]
Semi-Final
Championship
LOL Believe me, I understand. Wake was competitive when Jim Grobe was there until near the end of his tenure. I saw UCF in your earlier post (vs. Wake Forest) and, yes, that makes sense. FWIW, Appalachian would be a better Tier 3 team for Wake (long-time foe) while James Madison may be better for UNC. I get the idea, though. Interesting.

Now, had you left Duke out.....
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-27-18, 08:52 PM
Gh0st Gh0st is offline
All World
 
Join Date: 08-18-11
Posts: 4,091
Gh0st is on a distinguished road
Unfortunately, TV contracts will always get in the way of aligning or expanding the conferences the way the fans would like to see. It's the reason Maryland and Rutgers got in and the reason Texas and Oklahoma will get left put of the Big 10.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 09-28-18, 05:32 AM
Sig Hansen Sig Hansen is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 03-28-08
Location: not Cleveland
Posts: 17,674
Sig Hansen can only hope to improve
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max Grumbleman View Post
Awhile ago, I played around with the idea of a promotion/relegation system for college football as a way to improve the season while keeping the current FBS teams in the loop. I settled on a 3-tier system (called the College Football Series) in which teams could move between tiers based on performance (on-field and attendance) over a 4-year period. I based the tiers on competitiveness, market size, and stadium capacity:

This is great. Well done
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 10-01-18, 12:54 PM
14Red 14Red is online now
All World
 
Join Date: 03-12-12
Posts: 4,482
14Red is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwwarrior09 View Post
I actually don't hate that idea. The only issue I see is that there would theoretically be a few loaded regions (Big Ten East + Notre Dame, SEC/ACC in the southeast, Big XII + SEC West centered around Texas), while a couple of regions are guaranteed to suck, such as a region that would probably have Penn State, Pitt, Rutgers, UConn, Boston College, Maryland, Virginia and Virginia Tech.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I"m not sure what team you follow, but I"m pretty sure there wouldn't be a region with big ten teams that's "loaded". There is what 10-12 teams in the league now and only 3-4 are legit nationwide, and there are a couple that are far away.

I do not envision any set up like that that would include Rutgers. I don't think Rutgers would win the MAC.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 10-01-18, 12:55 PM
14Red 14Red is online now
All World
 
Join Date: 03-12-12
Posts: 4,482
14Red is on a distinguished road
Nice work guys, now you're thinking my way!! Let's not just let the powerhouse schools coast to the playoffs year after year.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 11-17-18, 05:43 PM
Crusaders Crusaders is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 09-06-04
Location: Not Cincinnati
Posts: 36,374
Crusaders is on a distinguished road
Indiana leads Michigan 17-15 at the half
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 11-17-18, 05:45 PM
nwwarrior09 nwwarrior09 is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 11-11-09
Location: Springfield/Dayton
Posts: 7,162
nwwarrior09 is on a distinguished road
Really bad sequence there at the end of the half, coming away with nothing inside the 10 yard line.

Indiana was surprisingly effective running the ball in the 1st half IMO.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 11-24-18, 07:21 PM
Crusaders Crusaders is offline
All Yappi
 
Join Date: 09-06-04
Location: Not Cincinnati
Posts: 36,374
Crusaders is on a distinguished road
Rutgers trying to hold on against Michigan State. Michigan State's offense is atrocious
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ĎThe Big Bang Theoryí to End With Season 12 Yappi General Board 27 08-29-18 09:49 AM
Big Walnut looking for dual huntergreen Wrestling 1 12-29-17 09:07 AM
How ironic OHSAA violations lead to Big Red Championship pick6 Football 1 12-12-17 03:50 PM
Big Dawg Invitational jhardman Tournaments looking for teams, open tournaments, wrestling camps/clubs, etc. 1 09-22-17 09:04 AM
Big Ten Pick'Em bdhof Wrestling 90 03-07-16 02:26 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Registration Booster - Powered By Dirt RIF CustUmz