Sectionals, Districts, State

[swimfan]

So, predictions...projections...let the discussions begin

[ImpartialOutsider]

Does anyone else think it's a little ridiculous that the Northeast division gets the most automatic qualifiers even though they're by far the weakest district?

[thedutchman]

OHSAA determines the number of automatic qualifiers based on the number of schools with swimming teams in the district. As in other sports the Northeast is far and away the largest district, therefore they recieve the most automatic qualifiers. In recent years the Northeast has not had a single dominant and powerful team in D1 so it may seem that it is slower. And it is true that in the last few years it has not produced as many swimmers in the finals and consolation finals that you would expect from such a large district. However, they are not the weakest district regardless of how you measure them. Here are the slowest qualifiers to each district from 2009.

200 Medley Relay - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 1:53.65; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 2:33.66; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 2:15.79; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 1:48.09

200 Free - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 1:53.65; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 2:00.30; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 2:12.73; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 1:55.27

200 IM - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 2:11.19; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 2:20.52; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 3:20.58; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 2:14.66

50 Free - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 23.41; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 24.20; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 25.50; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 24.04

100 Fly - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 58.86; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 1:02.13; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 1:26.14; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 59.25

100 Free - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 51.59; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 53.14; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 57.45; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 52.22

500 Free - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 5:10.61; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 5:36.28; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 6:01.19; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 5:18.82

200 Free Relay - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 1:39.46; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 2:00.11; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 1:57.81; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 1:34.50

100 Back - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 1:02.95; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 1:04.69; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 1:21.15; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 1:01.46

100 Breast - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 1:05.82; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 1:11.00; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 1:16.88; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 1:07.42

400 Free Relay - 2009 SW: slowest qualifier 3:41.36; 2009 C: slowest qualifier 4:46.28; 2009 NW slowest qualifier 4:18.22; 2009 NE slowest qualifier 3:30.03

Even more impressive is that the Northeast takes 40 qualifiers in the individual events and 20 in the relays. The Southwest & Northwest take 32 in the individual events and the Central takes 30. So clearly the Northeast is not the weakest district. In recent years the Northeast has been weaker at the top of the range than in past years and the lack of a dominant team at the state level makes the district seem weaker. But traditionally the Northwest is the weakest follwed by the Central.

[ImPartial]

In the southwest, the slowest qualifier to the district meet usually represents the slowest automatic qualifer from the slowest sectional. So the times you list reflect where the slowest sectional is within a particular district.

Does anyone else think it's a little ridiculous that the Northeast division gets the most automatic qualifiers even though they're by far the weakest district?

This comment is refers to the five automatic qualifiers the NE gets to the state meet. In half the individual events last year, automatic qualifiers from the NE bumped swimmers from other districts with faster times. This may be the source of the perception that the NE is the "weakest" district. These are the automatic qualifiers that bumped faster times from the state meet:

200 free: [bumped Buchanan Beavercreek 1:44.70]
1:45.35 Madison
1:45.21 Solon

IM: [bumped Herman StJohns 1:59.84, Torbet Mason,1:59.96, Ross Pickerington 1:59.97]
2:01.45 St Ig
2:01.06 Wooster
2:00.64 Hoover

500: [bumped Gores StX 4:47.05, Nuss Fairfield 4:47.39, Neri UA 4:49.28]
4:55.52 Hudson
4:54.25 Hudson
4:49.63 Shaker Heights

breaststroke: [bumped Shotwell StC 1:00.57, Hanson Mason 1:01.24]
1:02.07 Medina
1:01.59 Stow
1:01.00 Solon

[swimfan]

Both the Southwest & Northeast District take any swimmer who is faster than the slowest automatic qualifier. If the state meet had the same rule then no one would be bumped by a slow automatic qualifier. In this instance it would only have added 4 heats to the prelims.

[ImPartial]

The raw stats for number of individual qualifiers per district for Boys DI last year were:

SW C NW NE
90 37 21 44

The number of at-large qualifiers were:
58 13 13 4

The number of top-24 fastest times were (this ignores automatic qualifiers):
95 40 22 35

You can see that the SW had roughly the same number of top-24 times as the rest of the state combined.

The automatic qualifers are a crude representation of the "swimming population" from each district. OHSAA uses the number of swim schools in a district divided by the total swim schools in the state to determine the relative number of auto qualifiers.

SW C NW NE
4 3 1 5

If these ratios held for both auto and at-large qualifiers, there would be 5 of every 13 (38%) qualifiers coming from the NE district. This would have projected this expected distribution of qualifiers per district based on population:
59 44 15 74

It's pretty clear who exceeds expectations and who does not.

If you divide the number of actual top-24 times by the number of D1 schools per district, you can normalize this data into a top-24/school value:
SW C NW NE
2.07 1.43 1.47 0.714

This does indicate that on a per-capita basis, the NE district produced significantly less top-24 times than the other districts.

[thedutchman]

Interesting analysis Impartial and quite convincing for Boys D1. My question is does the data result in similar findings for the girls divisions and boys D2? Or is the Northeast stronger in those areas. I haven't looked but the presence of Hawken & University may tilt things more in the Northeast's favor in those divisions. Also, does the data support your finding when looked at over a number of years rather than just 1?

[ImPartial]

Well, it was quite tedious to compile that. Someone with sufficient interest is more than welcome to attack D2 and the girls' side.

[ImpartialOutsider]

It seems like the top teams in the Northeast district this year are Firestone, Solon, Hoover, and Canfield, none of whom have any sort of shot at placing in the top 5 at state. Last year in many instances, as Impartial pointed out, automatic qualifiers from the Northeast with slower times took the spots of other people who deserved to be there. I realize that we have this argument every year, and I do like the idea of automatic qualifiers, I just think we need to change the distribution of them. The southwest is always the fastest - give them the most.

[thedutchman]

Check out the results of the Greater Catholic League Championship Meet at

http://www.swimmeet.com/meets/gcl110/

Anyone who had doubts about how good StX is this year can put those away. X's times are very fast and NONE of their top swimmers were in the meet. In fact, most of the guys who swam for X in this meet won't even be on the sectional team. If anyone was wondering who is going to win the state meet, they need wonder no more. It's a battle for second!

[Makes Girls Go Bad]

thedutchman makes a very very smart statement

[ff2332]

It seems like the top teams in the Northeast district this year are Firestone, Solon, Hoover, and Canfield, none of whom have any sort of shot at placing in the top 5 at state. Last year in many instances, as Impartial pointed out, automatic qualifiers from the Northeast with slower times took the spots of other people who deserved to be there. I realize that we have this argument every year, and I do like the idea of automatic qualifiers, I just think we need to change the distribution of them. The southwest is always the fastest - give them the most.

I think you will be surprised, there should be at least one ne team to crack into the top 8 maybe 5. And one question, how is the state meet scored? Is it 20 for first individual and 40 for relays?

[ImpartialOutsider]

I think you will be surprised, there should be at least one ne team to crack into the top 8 maybe 5.

Top 8, probably. Top 5, no chance.

[ff2332]

Top 8, probably. Top 5, no chance.

like the confidence we will see when state comes...

[swimfan]

Worthington Sectional Psych Sheet is up on Central District site. Schuster is swimming as expected the 200 free, but also 100 free. Interesting choice.

[Swimmerman5428]

could you put up a link to that?

[swimfan]

Central District Sectional Psych Sheets are at http://www.cdab.org/sports/sd/default.htm

[ohiocuse]

looks like they took them down, but schuttinger is also in the 100 free, spangler in the 50 and 100

[ff2332]

im surprised schuttinger is swimming the 100 free. he must not have too much confidence in his 200 free or im.

[thedutchman]

im surprised schuttinger is swimming the 100 free. he must not have too much confidence in his 200 free or im.

I suspect he and his coach are looking at the state field and have concluded that he has an easier time finishing higher in the 100 free than the 200. The 200 should be very competitive at the top. It will probably take a sub 1:40 to win it while the 100 doesn't look that fast this year.

[swimfan]

looks like they took them down, but schuttinger is also in the 100 free, spangler in the 50 and 100

They're still there. At least the boys are. You just have to click on the psych sheet link under each sectional. For some reason the UA Girls Sectional link sends you to Worthington. And as is typical Academy (who is always last to post results) doesn't have its psych sheet up.

Anyway is anyone else surprised to see Spangler in the 50? Is he taking one for the team or will he top heat at state? I had figured him to potentially top heat in the 200, but at least in the district meet UA picks up more team points by swimming him in the 50. And on paper at least, it looks like SC's reign as District Champ may end this year.

[Paine]

Southwest sectionals are up on swimmeet.com: http://swimmeet.com/meets/swdistrict10/

ff2332 I do believe it's 20 points for an individual first and 40 for a relay win, with every place having it's individual score doubled for relay finishes.

It will be interesting to see how schuttinger handles the double events again this year. There will be a break between the fly and 100 free, but last year he seemed to lack a little pop in the 100 free. Perhaps he will be in a better position to do his best possible swims in both events this year.

[thedutchman]

Haven't seen Cville entries yet, but as expected with the exception of John Galvin no one from X's League Meet is on its Sectional Team. I guess even X couldn't ignore a 1:45 in the 200. Otherwise X's entries are pretty much as expected. No one will be close to them at any of the levels. They could even swim their league relays in the sectional (and perhaps district) if they wanted and move them along. I'm sure they won't, but I would expect them to unstack the relays until the state finals.

As for Spangler, that looks like a good move to me. He's swimming very fast in season and will probably reach the final heat in both the 50 and the 100. However, before UA starts making room for the district trophy they need to get the taper right. Last year it looked like they had SC...on paper...and we know how that turned out. With the way they have tapered in recent years I wouldn't write SC off at the district or state level.

[ImPartial]

Haven't seen Cville entries yet, but as expected with the exception of John Galvin no one from X's League Meet is on its Sectional Team. I guess even X couldn't ignore a 1:45 in the 200. Otherwise X's entries are pretty much as expected. No one will be close to them at any of the levels. They could even swim their league relays in the sectional (and perhaps district) if they wanted and move them along. I'm sure they won't, but I would expect them to unstack the relays until the state finals.

As for Spangler, that looks like a good move to me. He's swimming very fast in season and will probably reach the final heat in both the 50 and the 100. However, before UA starts making room for the district trophy they need to get the taper right. Last year it looked like they had SC...on paper...and we know how that turned out. With the way they have tapered in recent years I wouldn't write SC off at the district or state level.

I wondered what they would do with Galvin. None of X's top 4 times went to GCL, so I would think it was a taper meet for everyone that participated. Will Galvin be able to hold his taper through district, or drop time? It usually takes a 1:44 high to qualify for state.

Spangler was not in the top 14 in the 200 as listed on swimmeet. He was 10th in the 50 before people like Schuster and Whitaker drop out. Also, it leaves Spangler fresher for the relays.

[ImPartial]

Interesting choice by Centerville...Molly Osterhage is only entered in one individual event, the 100 free. It would appear she would then be able to swim in all three relays. She currently has the second fastest time in the state in the 50 free and the third fastest time in the 100 free.

[preeder61]

Interesting choice by Centerville...Molly Osterhage is only entered in one individual event, the 100 free. It would appear she would then be able to swim in all three relays. She currently has the second fastest time in the state in the 50 free and the third fastest time in the 100 free.

Very interesting, talk about taking one for the team points! She already has her scholarship to Michigan, so these be good points for Centerville's relays.

[ff2332]

I suspect he and his coach are looking at the state field and have concluded that he has an easier time finishing higher in the 100 free than the 200. The 200 should be very competitive at the top. It will probably take a sub 1:40 to win it while the 100 doesn't look that fast this year.

i havent seen the ne district yet, but i think the 100 will be just as competitive to win as the 200 judging by the field so far. i think it will take probably a low 45 or high 44 to win.

[preeder61]

i havent seen the ne district yet, but i think the 100 will be just as competitive to win as the 200 judging by the field so far. i think it will take probably a low 45 or high 44 to win.

That is a huge jump from 46 high, who do you predict will drop almost 2 seconds? Is Schuster capable of sub 46? Everson and Disalle are top seed in NW, Schwab and Williams in the SW. This is competitive with a bunch of guys clustered in the high 46, low 47 range now. (Personally very interesting to me)

[ff2332]

That is a huge jump from 46 high, who do you predict will drop almost 2 seconds? Is Schuster capable of sub 46? Everson and Disalle are top seed in NW, Schwab and Williams in the SW. This is competitive with a bunch of guys clustered in the high 46, low 47 range now. (Personally very interesting to me)

if none took a small rest or rest at all this season then a 45 mid/high should definitely be within reach for the guys that posted a 46 or 47 low. why have fast do you think these guys will go, just interested to see other opinions?

[ohiocuse]

i think 45.5 is a pretty good number that if you are below that you have a good chance to win, i know those are numbers we are looking at for sure

[superman61]

Does anyone else think it's a little ridiculous that the Northeast division gets the most automatic qualifiers even though they're by far the weakest district?

Why not take the 1st place finisher from each district as an automatic so the that all are represented and let the chips fall where they may. All other qualifiers make it by the times they swim. Also add 10 more swimmers to each event (1 heat). We swim three heats at prelims just to eliminate 1. After all the OHSAA claims they do this for the athletes so let's really do something for them!

[ImPartial]

Some of the NE sectionals are starting to post psych sheets. Kevin Meisner is missing from the Firestone meet:

http://www.nedab.org/Swim%20Diving%20Pages/akron_b1_north_psyche.pdf

[ff2332]

Some of the NE sectionals are starting to post psych sheets. Kevin Meisner is missing from the Firestone meet:

http://www.nedab.org/Swim%20Diving%20Pages/akron_b1_north_psyche.pdf

yeah i heard from a firestone source meisner is missing because he failed some classes. this will significantly play apart in the 100 back and fly depth, also the firestone was a contender for the 200 medley top 8.

[OhioSWIM002]

is he really out for the postseason???

[ff2332]

is he really out for the postseason???

yes supposedly he failed some classes, its really unfortunate that it happened. But, you really almost gotta try, to fail a class.

[bhs warrior]

I do not see any male divers for UA in the psych sheets, anyone know if this is correct

[swimfan]

I do not see any male divers for UA in the psych sheets, anyone know if this is correct

That's surprising since UA has the defending state champ and had 2 other underclassmen who also scored in the district meet last year.

[caswim]

there are no divers listed on the UA sectional, probably a clerical error.

[caswim]

im surprised schuttinger is swimming the 100 free. he must not have too much confidence in his 200 free or im.

200IM makes a tough combo with 100 fly and schuttinger was a 20. 50 freestyler last year....pretty sure he'll have some speed for the 100free

[ohiocuse]

no holestein (sp) this year from what i have heard, i believe a back injury from platform stuff

[swimfan]

Some interesting numbers to ponder based upon the sectional psych sheets. Assuming everyone holds their place (which they won't...people will move up and fall back), each district scores out as follows (without diving):

Southwest: StX 403, Cville 380
Northeast: Strongsville 198, Solon 196
Northwest: Stf 541, St John 330
Central: UA 379, SC 361

So it looks like the only lock is in the Northwest. The Northeast is certainly up for grabs. The Central looks like it will depend upon the taper and the Southwest is surprisingly close, but StX has more room to move up than Cville does.

[preeder61]

Some interesting numbers to ponder based upon the sectional psych sheets. Assuming everyone holds their place (which they won't...people will move up and fall back), each district scores out as follows (without diving):

Southwest: StX 403, Cville 380
Northeast: Strongsville 198, Solon 196
Northwest: Stf 541, St John 330
Central: UA 379, SC 361

.

With UA's Miranda out due to a medical issue, the gap between UA and SC might be closed.

[thedutchman]

Southwest: StX 403, Cville 380
Northeast: Strongsville 198, Solon 196
Northwest: Stf 541, St John 330
Central: UA 379, SC 361



Solon will score major points in diving. That should put them over the top in the Northeast. StX always tapers well, Cville traditionally does not so they are not likely to overtake StX. Central may come down to relays. The psych sheets in the Central are misleading because New Albany is entered in each relay with their state time from 09. As a result they are favored to win each relay. They won't. So if SC wins the relays they will pick up the points necessary to win the Central district. My pick is SC in the Central...but it will be very close.

[GoinDistance]

Is Miranda really out? That could hurt UA in the relays as well as the fly

[superman61]

Looking at all the districts that have posted so far today and in my opinion; and we all know what opinions are like!
NW looks pretty much buisiness as usual St. Francis has a firm grasp on that district with St. John's chasing behind them.
NE still has not posted they are usually the last to put anything up after sectionals. Alot of different venues I suppose but I do not think there will be any huge changes there.
C looks as if it will be the St. Chuck's UA challenge again could come down the relays but UA has made a big 500 free statement coming out of sectionals. It will be interesting to see how this unfolds, there are a few unknowns who could squeak in between the two schools and cause trouble for both schools.
SW Just don't see anyone getting past St. X there. But is does appear that in the individual sprints the bombers could be in one heck of a dog fight. Sectional times across the board are looking pretty quick, should a fast district meet again. There are a lot of fast swimmers spread across other schools but X is at or near the top in most events with some really nice depth.

Just one humble opinion. Have a great week all.

[swimfan]

Based on sectional times here’s how each district scores out:

Central District:
1 Upper Arlington 441
2 St Charles 401
3 New Albany 171
4 Olentangy Liberty 152
5 Westerville Central 127
6 Dublin Scioto 119
7 Thomas Worthington 106
8 Dublin Coffman 93
9 Westerville South 90
10 Grove City 89

Southwest:
1 St Xavier 517
2 Centerville 293
3 Loveland 153
3 Moeller 153
5 Sycamore 112
6 Milford 107
7 Fairfield 96
8 La Salle 89
9 Princeton 87
10 Anderson 75

Northeast:
1 Strongsville 201
2 North Canton Hoover 199
3 Solon 172
4 Hudson 149
5 Canfield 136
6 St Ignatius 130
7 Medina 105
8 Wooster 103
9 Mayfield 102
10 Shaker Heights 100
(Diving is not included in the point calculation because the Northeast has no ranking, But Solon has 4 divers entered and Hudson has 2. No others in the top 5 have divers.)

Northwest:
1 St Francis 587
2 St John 345
3 Sandusky 183
4 Findlay 174
5 Ashland 171
6 Freemont Ross 167
7 Mansfield 143
8 Bowling Green 136
9 Sylvania Southview 89
10 Sylvania Northview 63

[thedutchman]

Some interesting numbers to ponder based upon the sectional psych sheets.
Southwest: StX 403, Cville 380
Northeast: Strongsville 198, Solon 196
Northwest: Stf 541, St John 330
Central: UA 379, SC 361


Based on sectional times here’s how each district scores out:

Central District:
1 Upper Arlington 441
2 St Charles 401
Southwest:
1 St Xavier 517
2 Centerville 293
Northeast:
1 Strongsville 201
2 North Canton Hoover 199
3 Solon 172
Northwest:
1 St Francis 587
2 St John 345


It looks like UA has moved up and is not making the mistake it did last year. SC will have to drop alot to catch them. Centerville is either right on the money this year or has started its swoon early. Hopefully they know they can't take X and are aiming the taper for the state meet. Boy the Northeast looks like the meet to be at assuming that Solon doesn't put it away with their diving.

[swimfan]

Based on sectional times here are the top 10 in D1 & D2:
D1
StX 243
UA 238
NC Hoover 148
SC 138
Cvillle 134
Canfield 85
Sville 77
Loveland 69
Moeller 65
StF 57

D2
Unv 315
Wyom 218
Dayton Oakwood 130
Lima Shawnee 125
Sandusky Perkins 118
Walsh Jesuit 98
Col Academy 85
Chagrin Falls 80
Revere 78
Clev Orange 63

[ff2332]

im surprised hoover would have that many points. but, i feel that should surely change as districts roles around.

[caswim]

im surprised hoover would have that many points. but, i feel that should surely change as districts roles around.

That's almost exclusively due to relays. The other deeper teams don't swim their top relays at Sectionals....that will change dramatically after districts.

[ff2332]

That's almost exclusively due to relays. The other deeper teams don't swim their top relays at Sectionals....that will change dramatically after districts.

i totally agree, who are there top guys individually that could possibly post some points at state?

[Hoover1988]

i totally agree, who are there top guys individually that could possibly post some points at state?

They have a top 12 50 freestlyer whos a sophmore. They have a top 10 200 Im whos a sophmore. They are also sending someone in the fly, back, and 50 free. All 3 relays are top 8. Including the 200 free relay which is seated 1st by almost a second! All the kids on the relay were not completely tapered and didnt have fast suits on, or completely shaved.

[ff2332]

They have a top 12 50 freestlyer whos a sophmore. They have a top 10 200 Im whos a sophmore. They are also sending someone in the fly, back, and 50 free. All 3 relays are top 8. Including the 200 free relay which is seated 1st by almost a second! All the kids on the relay were not completely tapered and didnt have fast suits on, or completely shaved.

yea they seem to have a good team from what I saw from the results. and judging by there performance they should grab some points at state. but, i do feel that some of those guys had to be tapered to pull off the times they did. i think the only real people that did not taper yet are some very few indivs. and 2-3 x guys but besides that, i think you will see quite a few times around the same times from districts.

[thedutchman]

Year in and year out the swimmers who can hold their district time in the state meet move up. The overwhelming majority of the qualifiers will swim slower than they did in their district meet. Good luck to all the qualifiers.

[swimfan]

Based on sectional times here’s how each district scores out:

Central District:
1 Upper Arlington 441
2 St Charles 401
3 New Albany 171
4 Olentangy Liberty 152
5 Westerville Central 127
6 Dublin Scioto 119
7 Thomas Worthington 106
8 Dublin Coffman 93
9 Westerville South 90
10 Grove City 89

Southwest:
1 St Xavier 517
2 Centerville 293
3 Loveland 153
3 Moeller 153
5 Sycamore 112
6 Milford 107
7 Fairfield 96
8 La Salle 89
9 Princeton 87
10 Anderson 75

Northeast:
1 Strongsville 201
2 North Canton Hoover 199
3 Solon 172
4 Hudson 149
5 Canfield 136
6 St Ignatius 130
7 Medina 105
8 Wooster 103
9 Mayfield 102
10 Shaker Heights 100
(Diving is not included in the point calculation because the Northeast has no ranking, But Solon has 4 divers entered and Hudson has 2. No others in the top 5 have divers.)

Northwest:
1 St Francis 587
2 St John 345
3 Sandusky 183
4 Findlay 174
5 Ashland 171
6 Freemont Ross 167
7 Mansfield 143
8 Bowling Green 136
9 Sylvania Southview 89
10 Sylvania Northview 63

Well here's how they finished...

Central:
1 Columbus St. Charles 399.5
2 Upper Arlington 399
3 New Albany 148
4 Powell Olentangy Liberty 134
4 Westerville Central 134
6 Dublin Scioto 130
7 Thomas Worthington 120
8 Westerville South 103
9 Worthington Kilbourne 99
10 Grove City 90

Southwest:
1 Cincinnati St. Xavier 491
2 Centerville 388
3 Loveland 169
4 Cincinnati Moeller 161
5 Cincinnati Sycamore 126
6 Fairfield 109
7 Milford 90
7 Cincinnati Turpin 90
9 Cincinnati Anderson 83
10 Cincinnati La Salle 73

Northeast:
1. Solon 239
2. Strongsville 233
3. North Canton Hoover 199.5
4. Hudson 190
5. Cleveland St. Ignatius 157
6. Canfield 124
7. Wooster 114
8. Medina 107
9. Massillon Perry 95
10. Westlake 92

Northwest:
1 Toledo St. Francis De Sales 592
2 Toledo St. John's Jesuit 390
3 Findlay 192
4 Fremont Ross 190
5 Ashland 176
6 Sandusky 147
7 Bowling Green 137
8 Sylvania Southview 115
9 Mansfield 108
10 Sylvania Northview 68