Would you be OK if Trump called it on election night and prevented states from counting all the mail in ballots?

19AL63

Well-known member
I don't think he will declare himself President , but he might come out and say it is wonderful that I won again after CNN and MSNBC have their second melt down in four years. I found it very entertaining to watch four years ago and I am hoping for a repeat come Nov.
 

MoeDude

Roll Me Away!
There is no proven voter fraud of consequence Most famous comeback from the Democrats because they are the one's committing almost all of the voter fraud that is being caught. Did you notice the problems in New York with mail primaries earlier this year. The obvious is so clear Happy and the Democrats are pissed that the general public is watching and realize what they are trying to do with mail in voting. Look up how Al Franken won in Minnesota a few years ago and you'll understand the concern about mail in voting.
Trump did collude with Russia and did obstruct justice. (For Christsakes he was building a trump tower in Russia and has been financed by russians for decades. Based on what , a fake dossier payed for by the Clintons and re-enforced by government hacks that were in Collusion with the Democrat party?!?!?
He was impeached for asking another foreign leader to participate in a quid pro quo in the election. Worthy of censor MAYBE but not impeachment. That whole ch!7 show was so that Pelosi could get on record that she impeached Trump. Everyone knew the charges did not warrant impeachment and that it would never get by the Senate.
He also paid of a porn star he bar backed using russian campaign donations. You all sure are fascinated by his sex life and interactions with the women he associated with in his past. Besides he was set up. :ROFLMAO:

However, even if we ignore all of the above...you are fine with him declaring himself president with out counting all the votes.
And you try to make fun of me over the fact I stated Obama considered declaring Martial Law to stay in office. I wish I had saved the links to evidence that it was considered. But this charge your making is just flat out ludicrous. Your fishing expeditions get more comical with each passing week.
 

lotr10

Well-known member
Except the vote is in on time. I support the casting of the ballot by a fixed date. A voting machine just captures a vote just like a mail in ballot. The machine is not the ultimate destination. There is plumbing (networks and systems) that allows that vote to be counted and aggregated. The mail system is just another method of plumbing. The speed or the reliability of the plumbing should not invalidate legal ballots no matter how they are cast. This is really not even a debatable subject. Any attempt to overturn States rulings on this should and will fail.
I disagree. I don't care how votes are cast as long as there is some form of identification incorporated into the process. You know the sacred rule of ONE VOTE FOR ONE PERSON. What I do care about is that the ONLY votes that should be counted are those that were PROVEN to have been cast on or before election day.

It's all about the reliability of the chain of voting much like the importance of the reliability of the chain of custody in a criminal trial. When you vote on or before election day at a voting machine there is almost zero risk that the act can be corrupted.

If you allow a vote that arrives in the mail or is delivered to an election committee AFTER the day of voting you're facilitating voter fraud.
 

PolarBearPaul

Active member
For loving to wave a flag around and suck off the military, there sure is a lot of anti American thought in this thread coming from the Trumpanzees. And you call yourselves patriots. You're just a laughable bunch of old queens.
 

Termite2

Well-known member
A reminder in the 2016 election in Florida; the Democrats sued to have ballots from overseas Military rejected because they did not have a postal date stamp. The point is both sides are hypocrites when it comes to anything political
 

MoeDude

Roll Me Away!
For loving to wave a flag around and suck off the military, there sure is a lot of anti American thought in this thread coming from the Trumpanzees. And you call yourselves patriots. You're just a laughable bunch of old queens.
It's supposed to be another beautiful sunny day in Ohio today. You should craw out of your hole and soak up some vitamin D today. It might, and I emphasize might, improve your disposition. 🌞
 
Last edited:

Indiandad

Well-known member
I don't see what wrong with Bloomberg giving money to pay off fines for someone else; criminalizing that is a huge rat hole. Where would that stop?
It's a crime if he is attaching a quid pro quo of they have register and vote for Biden.


It is illegal to buy votes.

Did Bloomberg make a statement?
 

chs1971

Well-known member
There is no proven voter fraud of consequence
Trump did collude with Russia and did obstruct justice. (For Christsakes he was building a trump tower in Russia and has been financed by russians for decades.
He was impeached for asking another foreign leader to participate in a quid pro quo in the election.
He also paid of a porn star he bar backed using russian campaign donations.

However, even if we ignore all of the above...you are fine with him declaring himself president with out counting all the votes.
This is what stupid sounds like.
 

Happygoluckky

Well-known member
You are one dumb MF....

You have no clue how the election process works.
Neither does Trump. The other night he said about Ohio. "When you see them cheating on the other side - I don't say if; when - when you see them cheating with those ballots, all of those unsolicited ballots...any time you do, report 'em to the authorities. The authorities are waiting and watching."

He is doing russia's work of destorying the legitimacy of our election for them....they just applify his message on social media platforms with their bots and troll farms.
 

zeeman

Well-known member
There is no proven voter fraud of consequence
Trump did collude with Russia and did obstruct justice. (For Christsakes he was building a trump tower in Russia and has been financed by russians for decades.
He was impeached for asking another foreign leader to participate in a quid pro quo in the election.
He also paid of a porn star he bar backed using russian campaign donations.

However, even if we ignore all of the above...you are fine with him declaring himself president with out counting all the votes.
Yep
 

Indiandad

Well-known member
Neither does Trump. The other night he said about Ohio. "When you see them cheating on the other side - I don't say if; when - when you see them cheating with those ballots, all of those unsolicited ballots...any time you do, report 'em to the authorities. The authorities are waiting and watching."

He is doing russia's work of destorying the legitimacy of our election for them....they just applify his message on social media platforms with their bots and troll farms.
lol
 

chs1971

Well-known member
Neither does Trump. The other night he said about Ohio. "When you see them cheating on the other side - I don't say if; when - when you see them cheating with those ballots, all of those unsolicited ballots...any time you do, report 'em to the authorities. The authorities are waiting and watching."

He is doing russia's work of destorying the legitimacy of our election for them....they just applify his message on social media platforms with their bots and troll farms.
Now you care. You tools have been doing that for four years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: y2h

Purplemojo

Well-known member
Except it is not a crime in any way shape or form. That's just Gaetz being Gaetz.
"Vote here and get a beer and a hotdog". Tactics of the Boss system from the turn of the last century in many cities is now being used on a state level in Florida. Yes, it is a crime to give someone something of value to encourage them to vote. The little sticker they give you at the polls doesn't count, but paying someone's fines certainly does. This is nothing other than buying votes.
 

Happygoluckky

Well-known member
trump keeps saying the scotus will need to get involved. Why?

It is almost as if he has given up winning the EC or most votes in the election.
 
.
Top