Gh0st
Well-known member
And Purdue has 6 losses. What point are you trying to make?
The point he is trying to make is that 5 loss Auburn would roll through the Big 10.
It's a stupid point, but he's trying to make it nonetheless.
And Purdue has 6 losses. What point are you trying to make?
Football as any sport is all about matchups. That is why you see how a team like Purdue could catch OSU on an off day and beat them handily. I don't believe in the equate theory, but I see it argued on here or in the media, so I will play that game. I'm not all that surprised that Purdue is getting it taken to them because they do not match up well with Auburn, and Auburn in an experienced team who can do damage when playing to it ability. But the ACC is weak. It gets really tough when you have to play top quality teams all the time. Those teams will beat up on you and cause you to lose later on down the road because of the injuries you had in the prior games. I think that was the case of the OSU/Purdue game. I just think that BIG teams will get up for games. In the SEC and the ACC they just are too outcoached and overmatched to play with Clemson and Bama. I don't think that if they were in the BIG they would be able to play against storied programs like OSU, UM, PSU, MSU, Iowa, and Wisky and not have it take a toll. Then when you are not ready for it, a team like Purdue gets up for you and knocks you out. I just don't see that in the ACC and SEC right now. The ACC has more potential to get tougher because Miami and FSU have been and will be powerhouses. The rest of the ACC are basketball schools. The SEC has Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Auburn. Who else is that tough in the SEC? I guess LSU and Tennessee could get back to that elite status. I also think it's BS that they only play an eight game league schedule. There might be more upsets if say Bama played Texas A&M and then in that glorified bye week where they play teams like The Citadel, they had to play say a team from the East they avoided. I just think the playoff system as it is now favors two teams whose leagues can't tough them: Clemson and Bama.
Football as any sport is all about matchups. That is why you see how a team like Purdue could catch OSU on an off day and beat them handily. I don't believe in the equate theory, but I see it argued on here or in the media, so I will play that game. I'm not all that surprised that Purdue is getting it taken to them because they do not match up well with Auburn, and Auburn in an experienced team who can do damage when playing to it ability. But the ACC is weak. It gets really tough when you have to play top quality teams all the time. Those teams will beat up on you and cause you to lose later on down the road because of the injuries you had in the prior games. I think that was the case of the OSU/Purdue game. I just think that BIG teams will get up for games. In the SEC and the ACC they just are too outcoached and overmatched to play with Clemson and Bama. I don't think that if they were in the BIG they would be able to play against storied programs like OSU, UM, PSU, MSU, Iowa, and Wisky and not have it take a toll. Then when you are not ready for it, a team like Purdue gets up for you and knocks you out. I just don't see that in the ACC and SEC right now. The ACC has more potential to get tougher because Miami and FSU have been and will be powerhouses. The rest of the ACC are basketball schools. The SEC has Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Auburn. Who else is that tough in the SEC? I guess LSU and Tennessee could get back to that elite status. I also think it's BS that they only play an eight game league schedule. There might be more upsets if say Bama played Texas A&M and then in that glorified bye week where they play teams like The Citadel, they had to play say a team from the East they avoided. I just think the playoff system as it is now favors two teams whose leagues can't tough them: Clemson and Bama.
:laugh: Just stop before you type any more of this nonsense. You're losing credibility by the letter.Football as any sport is all about matchups. That is why you see how a team like Purdue could catch OSU on an off day and beat them handily. I don't believe in the equate theory, but I see it argued on here or in the media, so I will play that game. I'm not all that surprised that Purdue is getting it taken to them because they do not match up well with Auburn, and Auburn in an experienced team who can do damage when playing to it ability. But the ACC is weak. It gets really tough when you have to play top quality teams all the time. Those teams will beat up on you and cause you to lose later on down the road because of the injuries you had in the prior games. I think that was the case of the OSU/Purdue game. I just think that BIG teams will get up for games. In the SEC and the ACC they just are too outcoached and overmatched to play with Clemson and Bama. I don't think that if they were in the BIG they would be able to play against storied programs like OSU, UM, PSU, MSU, Iowa, and Wisky and not have it take a toll. Then when you are not ready for it, a team like Purdue gets up for you and knocks you out. I just don't see that in the ACC and SEC right now. The ACC has more potential to get tougher because Miami and FSU have been and will be powerhouses. The rest of the ACC are basketball schools. The SEC has Alabama, Georgia, Florida, and Auburn. Who else is that tough in the SEC? I guess LSU and Tennessee could get back to that elite status. I also think it's BS that they only play an eight game league schedule. There might be more upsets if say Bama played Texas A&M and then in that glorified bye week where they play teams like The Citadel, they had to play say a team from the East they avoided. I just think the playoff system as it is now favors two teams whose leagues can't tough them: Clemson and Bama.
I could see Clemson getting tripped up a game or two in the Big ten but they'd be at the top. Bama would be at the top annually. Notre Dame this season probably would be ok.
I don't know why big ten fans get all hot about the SEC. They are the best. They put the most players in the NFL, and it's not even close. Their lines are better, their speed is better.
My point with Ohio STate is they get to play all these big ten teams 7-8 games a season, most are inferior opponents. In the SEC, you have to bring it every single week. There are multiple NFL talent on all teams in the SEC. Not so in the big ten.
It's why I always say Ohio State HAS to play a top 10 team non-conference every season. TCU turned out to be a farce this year. There has to be some way of taking the scheduling away from the schools. All sports puts schedules together 6 months in advance, college football does it 6 years in advance, then hides behind it.
I think this has less to do with the B10 and more to do with dumb azzes who believe in the transitive property when evaluating Football teams.
Are you seriously comparing the SEC to the ACC???? Wow your dumber than I thought. Getting through the SEC schedule is much tougher than getting through the Big Ten schedule, in terms of injuries, tough games back to back and what not. Keep grasping at air, because you have no argument.
And yes playing Georgia, Auburn, LSU, Miss St, Texas A&M and Mizzou is tougher than facing the Big 10 East and the West champion.
Btw all of those teams I listed sans Auburn are ranked currently the top 25. That is 5 ranked opponents and arguably the 2nd lr 3rd best team in the country. Much tougher than what you proposed. No sane person could argue otherwise.
Would you rather insert OSU into the SEC West where they would play Bama, Miss St, LSU, TAMU, Auburn, and then Georgia in the championship? Come on
Quit taking Ls :laugh:
Bc they played Mizzou this year...I think tOSU would do fine in the SEC West. The only team that would give them a ton of trouble would be Alabama. I'm not saying that those other teams would not battle tOSU, but when tOSU plays its best, they beat all of those teams with the exception of Alabama, but they would beat Bama. It'd would be nice to see Bama make a trip to the Shoe in November. And how could you put Mizzou in the list? They would have the same record they have in the BIG.
There's plenty of non-quality opponents in the SEC. See the SEC East most years sans Georgia.
There's also NFL talent on almost every Big 10 roster. Ohio State does not always produce the most draft picks either.
:laugh: The sad part is you actually believe this. You went the imbecile route, further showing how beat you are in this conversation.Wow you don't know how to read because I didn't compare the SEC to the ACC, nor did I say the ACC was better than the SEC. Nor did I say the BIG Ten was better. I am saying that Alabama and Clemson would have a tougher time making in through the BIG Ten than their current conferences. You can disagree, but the last time tOSU played Alabama they beat the snot out of them. If you think playing Mississippi, LSU, Auburn, Mississippi, Tennessee, oh yeah that powerhouse Arkansas than playing UM, tOSU, MSU, PSU, and a couple more BIG teams then your dumber than I thought you are. Get a life imbecile. You can disagree if you like, but you did not make one valid argument other than to say they are better. That LSU's starting QB is a guy who had to leave tOSU because he was probably going to be third string. That is your tougher team? I'd like to see a home and home between tOSU and Bama. It would be interesting, but they would never do it. They would only play at some neutral site once. But to you, that makes the SEC the best league.
The B1G has at least 10 bad teams.
The B1G has at least 10 bad teams.