Termite2
Well-known member
Yeah, I'm crying because the Big 10 lost some football games. You got it.
According to the Ohio St president, TCU doesn't belong on the same field as Wis after that "murderous" big ten schedule Wis played.
Yeah, I'm crying because the Big 10 lost some football games. You got it.
Yeah, I'm crying because the Big 10 lost some football games. You got it.
Like I said, I'd love if the Big 10 faced Conference USA teams, but they play the toughest slate in the country without question. This was not a good year obviously.Man, you thought everybody in the country made fun of BIG 10 football before today......You ain't seen nothin' yet!!! Even Herbstriet just threw this league under the bus. I'm a BIG EAST fan, and even I feel bad for you guys. I don't know how you can spin what took place today.
How dare you post something published within 24 hours of the game to prove DR wrong. :laugh:
Like I said, I'd love if the Big 10 faced Conference USA teams, but they play the toughest slate in the country without question. This was not a good year obviously.
In the bowl season? Which game was that again? You're mistaken I think.They seem to play their share of the MAC though.
In the bowl season? Which game was that again? You're mistaken I think.
I was talking about the bowl season and comparing to bowl tie in like the Big East has which are laughable for a BCS conference. But if you want to change the subject, fine, I'm gone.No, the regular season. Lost to a mountain west team in a bowl though. I'm sure you saw that one.
One thing is certain this bowl season, the teams playing the Big Ten teams have an easy schedule.
I'll admit that made me laugh. But let me ad, that if the Big 10 is perennially overrated then why to teams brag about beating them? Especially in God's conference the SEC? They brag and brag and brag about beating the sorry Big 10. I don't get it, either the SEC is impressive because they win over Big 10 teams, or the SEC is skating by by being matched up with such a horrible conference like the Big 10. So explain that one to me.One thing is certain this bowl season, the teams playing the Big Ten teams have an easy schedule.
I was talking about the bowl season and comparing to bowl tie in like the Big East has which are laughable for a BCS conference. But if you want to change the subject, fine, I'm gone.
Barney Fife shot....and missed. Big surprise.
I'll admit that made me laugh. But let me ad, that if the Big 10 is perennially overrated then why to teams brag about beating them? Especially in God's conference the SEC? They brag and brag and brag about beating the sorry Big 10. I don't get it, either the SEC is impressive because they win over Big 10 teams, or the SEC is skating by by being matched up with such a horrible conference like the Big 10. So explain that one to me.
The ACC? That's NOT a feather in your cap. But my point stands you go ahead and list the matchups side by side and see which one is more difficult. Go back 5 years add those too. Tell me what shakes out.How did I change the subject? You DID NOT mention the bowl season in the post I responded to nor any previous post leading to it. :laugh:
In any event, the BE is facing the following conferences in the bowl season: B12 (Oklahoma and KSU); CUSA (So Miss); and ACC (NC State and Clemson). So I guess you were talking about one game.
The B10 lost to their bowl game to a non-AQ school. :shrug:
:laugh: It's a shame too, it was his only bullet.
The ACC? That's NOT a feather in your cap. But my point stands you go ahead and list the matchups side by side and see which one is more difficult. Go back 5 years add those too. Tell me what shakes out.
No need I know what it says. But you keep on beating that horse about the non AQ. The same non AQ that will dominate the BE next season. Then we can talk about how many teams lose to this poor non AQ team. Which team was favored? Which team was ranked 6 and which one was 3? Take out the names and if a favored 3 beats a 6 doesn't seem like news to me. You feel different?Umm, no, you list them out, if you want. I already showed which conference lost to the non-AQ school and it wasn't the BE.
No need I know what it says. But you keep on beating that horse about the non AQ. The same non AQ that will dominate the BE next season. Then we can talk about how many teams lose to this poor non AQ team. Which team was favored? Which team was ranked 6 and which one was 3? Take out the names and if a favored 3 beats a 6 doesn't seem like news to me. You feel different?
I mean Wisky could have beat them if Bielema had just pounded the ball at them...........but not taking anything away from TCU, but I think Wisconsin lost this game.....more than TCU necessarily "won" it....
Missed a short FG for 1. Bumbled clock management to end the 1st half for 2.I disagree. What did Wisconsin do to lose it? I thought both teams played a good game.
I disagree. What did Wisconsin do to lose it? I thought both teams played a good game.
Missed a short FG for 1. Bumbled clock management to end the 1st half for 2.
I stand corrected. Either way I'm not sure that TCU or Boise are the typical examples of a non AQ. They are the exception to the rule and WHEN they get into the BE they will show that, just like Cincy did when they left the CUSA.TCU will not beat a single school in the Big East next year, 2012 is a different story.
I don't disagree, I was just offering examples of things that could of turned the outcome that have nothing to do with anything TCU did to them. Let me add not running the ball for the two pointer. TCU was getting pushed around and I don't think they would of stopped Clay up the middle. On a side note, that Carder kid was the best player I've seen all bowl season.Teams miss field goals frequently. You can't chalk that up to blowing a game. And it was 39 yards, not sure if that's considered short or not.
I watched the whole game and I thought both teams played well. TCU won the game IMO.
I think TCU has a much bigger advantage over Boise.......they have the texas pool of recruits to begin with........
TCU won't be a non-AQ in 2012, so that argument will be over as far as them........