XFL Kick-off format
These two suggestions are polar opposites regarding kickoffs into the end zone. The XFL discourages them by placing the ball on the receiving team's 35-yard line. The CFL encourages them by awarding one point to the kicking team.One point for each kickoff that goes into the endzone ala CFL?
I like #31. When an offense fumbles the ball out of the end zone, it's not a touchback. The offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble.
2. 7 classifications to 6.
3. Divisions I-IV are schools that aren't a private school and don't have open enrollment by size. Division A are privates/open enrollment big schools. Division AA are privates/open enrollment small schools.
1. When an offense fumbles the ball out of the end zone, it's not a touchback. The offense keeps the ball at the spot of the fumble.
2. 7 classifications to 6.
3. Divisions I-IV are schools that aren't a private school and don't have open enrollment by size. Division A are privates/open enrollment big schools. Division AA are privates/open enrollment small schools.
I like #3
Couldn't agree more!!Pass interference - Defense is punished far too harshly for incidental contact
Illegal Men Downfield - The rule needs to be enforced, with the RPO how can you defend anything if you can get the OL down field?
Unnecessary roughness - Unless the hit could be avoided it's not unnecessary. There are times when violent contact is unavoidable, stop rewarding the offense for putting their guys at risk
One man's incidental contact is another man's felony assault. If it's incidental it shouldn't be called anyway.Pass interference - Defense is punished far too harshly for incidental contact
Officials are getting better at looking for this, but they liberalized the rules a couple of years ago. One step forward, one step back.Illegal Men Downfield - The rule needs to be enforced, with the RPO how can you defend anything if you can get the OL down field?
Almost never gets called, unless you thinking of something else.Unnecessary roughness - Unless the hit could be avoided it's not unnecessary. There are times when violent contact is unavoidable, stop rewarding the offense for putting their guys at risk
I've seen it called a bunch with specifically slants thrown right into a LB, big collision and a flag despite there being nothing illegal about the hitOne man's incidental contact is another man's felony assault. If it's incidental it shouldn't be called anyway.
Officials are getting better at looking for this, but they liberalized the rules a couple of years ago. One step forward, one step back.
Almost never gets called, unless you thinking of something else.
There's nothing in the rules about big collisions being illegal.I've seen it called a bunch with specifically slants thrown right into a LB, big collision and a flag despite there being nothing illegal about the hit
Good Lord........
It's not that big collisions are illegal by definition but they are called "Unnecessary Roughness" far more often than not. Especially if an offensive player is hurt by the collision. Offenses have taken advantage of this and thrown into more and more dangerous windows knowing they will likely get a call to bail them out of something goes wrong. There needs to be a large emphasis on what is actually "unnecessary" about a hitThere's nothing in the rules about big collisions being illegal.
Apparently you disagree with the judgment of the calling officials on those plays, which is fine.
I can tell you that this observation of yours (bunch of unnecessary roughness calls) has never been voiced by coaches around Ohio, or the country for that matter.It's not that big collisions are illegal by definition but they are called "Unnecessary Roughness" far more often than not. Especially if an offensive player is hurt by the collision. Offenses have taken advantage of this and thrown into more and more dangerous windows knowing they will likely get a call to bail them out of something goes wrong. There needs to be a large emphasis on what is actually "unnecessary" about a hit
These two suggestions are polar opposites regarding kickoffs into the end zone. The XFL discourages them by placing the ball on the receiving team's 35-yard line. The CFL encourages them by awarding one point to the kicking team.
Love this idea!
This is what I was referencing with the XFL style kickoff.
I probably should restate that to be: 6 classificationsWhat are the numbers on that? I don't think D1-4 are going to have very many schools. And by fairness if public and private are to be in the same organization, shouldn't an open enrollment private operating under fixed boundaries have the same access to those divisions?
Current NFHS rule;Love this idea!
Kickoffs are starting to go away at the youth level, so the kicking game is behind the 8-ball if you will by the time players reach the high school level.
I really, really think this is the best way to preserve kickoffs for the future.
Some of the XFL KO rules might need to be changed for HS, but this is not the worst idea I've heard. DEserves consideration.
This is what I was referencing with the XFL style kickoff.
The last unnecessary roughness I saw flagged was in 2018 on a retaliatory hit by a kid not involved in the play about 3 seconds after the whistle.It's not that big collisions are illegal by definition but they are called "Unnecessary Roughness" far more often than not. Especially if an offensive player is hurt by the collision. Offenses have taken advantage of this and thrown into more and more dangerous windows knowing they will likely get a call to bail them out of something goes wrong. There needs to be a large emphasis on what is actually "unnecessary" about a hit