adselder09
Well-known member
Lakota East def. Northmont 25-19, 25-19, 25-18
Watterson played the match they needed to beat St. Charles. Wattersonss coach made the right adjustments and motivated his team every step of the way.
St. Charles had the momentum going into the 5th set, actually won the coin flip and chose to receive, which was a bad coaching choice. Why would you just give another team back the momentum? It sure paid off for Watterson as they took an early lead and never gave it up.
Fitzwell, I agree with you
I was sitting close to the court on the players side and I feel sad for the St. Charles players who never got any words of encouragement from their coach.
I think you may be a bit confused regarding serve/receive choices. Without knowing the specifics, teams generally sideout more than 50% of the time. For rally scoring, it's most times beneficial to be receiving.
Friday, May 24:
Division 1 East #1 Regional Final
#1 Hilliard Darby def. #6 Dublin Coffman 25-19, 6-25, 25-13, 25-21
Division 1 East #2 Regional Final
#2 Mt Vernon def. #4 Dublin Jerome 25-23, 25-23, 27-25
Division 2 East Regional Final
#2 Bishop Watterson def. #1 St Charles 25-21, 25-21, 14-25, 20-25, 15-10
Saturday, May 25:
Division 1 North #1 Regional Final
#1 St Ignatius def. #5 Medina 25-7, 25-7, 25-9
Division 1 North #2 Regional Final
#2 Jackson def. #3 Hudson 25-21, 25-20, 13-25, 25-23
Division 2 North Regional Final
#1 Walsh Jesuit def. #2 Archbishop Hoban 25-19, 25-16, 15-25, 25-21
Division 1 West #1 Regional Final
#1 Lakota East def. #3 Northmont 25-19, 25-19, 25-14
Division 1 West #2 Regional Final
#2 Beavercreek def. #4 Kettering Fairmont 25-10, 25-16, 25-21
Division 2 West Regional Final
#3 Archbishop Alter def. #1 Bishop Fenwick 25-23, 29-27, 25-16
Division 1 South #1 Regional Final
#1 St Xavier def. #4 Mason 25-20, 25-22, 25-11
Division 1 South #2 Regional Final
#2 Archbishop Moeller def. #3 Elder 25-17, 19-25, 25-15, 25-18
Division 2 South Regional Final
#1 LaSalle def. #2 Badin 25-20, 18-25, 25-22, 25-18
I think you may be a bit confused regarding serve/receive choices. Without knowing the specifics, teams generally sideout more than 50% of the time. For rally scoring, it's most times beneficial to be receiving.
St Charles was a very shaky serving team so the decision is not too far out there. I have followed high school volleyball for a few years. St Charles has had some talent over the years, but they were usually club kids. Have the Grubers actually developed any players? From the few games that I have seen, I think their Libero coached the last two years and Lancia/McLane coached this year. Gruber has to be the most over-rated coach h out there. Close second to Vicki from Westerville South who still couldn't win with that talented core and then killed the program.
Yikes :dang:
Hate to see coaches getting called out like that - most coaches are putting a ton of time in - and maybe you didn't see development at St Charles, but didn't Gruber kind of put them back on the map? They still had a great year, as well.
I don't know as much about the West. South coach, but I did find it strange how the program dried up like that. Very sad.
Unfortunately, I have heard the same with regards to the St Charles program. I found it very surprising, but each person has their own opinion of the state of affairs.
What have you heard about the "surprising, unfortunate state of affairs" with the St. Charles program?
I'm a bit confused about what people are inferring here. First, it sounded like "it's a shame the players have coaches that doesn't want to win and won't coach/encourage them" and questioning the choice of serve/receive, and now you're making it seem like something else.
What is going on?
Simply stating I had heard the same with regards to St Charles program. If you sign up to coach, you should coach.