NEOsportsfan09
Active member
From someone I talked to previously about Waterloo and them in their move to MVAC, it was more about what was in best interest of them going forward. The conversation I had was over 15 months ago, so it may be off a little, but this is essentially what I was told from the Waterloo perspective.
1) What someone mentioned above about moving D4 Field to County if Metro adds a team is exactly one of the reasons why Waterloo was looking to move to the MVAC. Crestwood was D4 at the time, Southeast D4, Garfield D5, and so on. They didn't want to be in a conference where they were with several D4/D5 schools while they're getting smaller and they have a league around their size that they had the chance to join at the time.
2) Schedule. There isn't many options to fill a game in Weeks 4-10 and with Lake Center Christian not having football, no guarantee of expansion to get 8 schools with football in the County, and the talks of forcing crossover games? It made the move to the MVAC more enticing to them.
====
Below are my thoughts and not what was said to me in the conversation about Waterloo/MVAC.
Also, from what I interpreted, it's easy to see that the PTC will cater to the Metro more than the County. So why wouldn't Waterloo look somewhere that would benefit them? Again, benefit them. They should only do what they feel is in the best interest of their student-athletes, not the conference they're leaving or the schools in that conference. In my opinion, they were trying to get ahead of a potential bad situation in the PTC County.
I don't see Waterloo coming back to the PTC and leaving the MVAC any time soon; however, I wouldn't be shocked to see the MVAC and EOAC have a little shakeup with Toronto already leaving the EOAC and Leetonia, according to this thread, possibly on the way out as well.
I could very well see Sebring and another MVAC school going to the EOAC and then Valley Christian and possibly another PTC school joining the MVAC. Again, not anything I heard. Just taking an educated guess from what I've seen in the past with these conference alignments and also who needs a conference, etc.
1) What someone mentioned above about moving D4 Field to County if Metro adds a team is exactly one of the reasons why Waterloo was looking to move to the MVAC. Crestwood was D4 at the time, Southeast D4, Garfield D5, and so on. They didn't want to be in a conference where they were with several D4/D5 schools while they're getting smaller and they have a league around their size that they had the chance to join at the time.
2) Schedule. There isn't many options to fill a game in Weeks 4-10 and with Lake Center Christian not having football, no guarantee of expansion to get 8 schools with football in the County, and the talks of forcing crossover games? It made the move to the MVAC more enticing to them.
====
Below are my thoughts and not what was said to me in the conversation about Waterloo/MVAC.
Also, from what I interpreted, it's easy to see that the PTC will cater to the Metro more than the County. So why wouldn't Waterloo look somewhere that would benefit them? Again, benefit them. They should only do what they feel is in the best interest of their student-athletes, not the conference they're leaving or the schools in that conference. In my opinion, they were trying to get ahead of a potential bad situation in the PTC County.
I don't see Waterloo coming back to the PTC and leaving the MVAC any time soon; however, I wouldn't be shocked to see the MVAC and EOAC have a little shakeup with Toronto already leaving the EOAC and Leetonia, according to this thread, possibly on the way out as well.
I could very well see Sebring and another MVAC school going to the EOAC and then Valley Christian and possibly another PTC school joining the MVAC. Again, not anything I heard. Just taking an educated guess from what I've seen in the past with these conference alignments and also who needs a conference, etc.