OHSAA survey asks Ohio high schools for feedback on 16-team football playoff format

If byes were forced on the top four by region, then the Monday of week 11 has no film review + gameplanning while the Saturday of that week 11 has no film review of the team’s performance from the night before.

What motivation exists to accept a bye, despite that, for a coach of a top four team?
getting healthy. everyone is banged up by week 10, some more than others. some teams may need the bye and some may not, so i think you do a draw and give the top 4 teams an opportunity to take it or not, then pass it down by seed.
 
My 2 cents.
  • Do you believe a 10-week regular season football schedule is too long? No.
  • Do you believe a six-week tournament to become a football state champion is too long? Yes.
  • Did your school qualify for the playoffs in the last four years? (This question is followed by two more asking the best and worst seed a given program has earned within that time frame.) Yes.
  • What is your preference on the number of qualifiers per region? (Choices are 16 or 12 with a first-round bye for the top four teams. Respondents can submit a different number in general comments at the end of the survey.) 8
  • If the number of qualifiers were reduced to 12 teams, would you prefer to have a first-round bye as one of the top four seeds of a region? Yes? (I'd rather just have 8 teams, and 12 teams doesn't work without a bye, so it's kind of a loaded question.)
They let everyone that wanted in to the playoffs in during the covid year, I get that. They got greedy and bumped it to 16 teams since 2021, but the product on the field is most of those first round games (save the 8/9, 7/10, and to some extent 6/11) are not competitive. Some could argue that level of skill disparity is actually dangerous. This isn't peewee or 8U baseball, it's varsity football in a state that produces some really good high-level football at all divisional levels. Not everyone (most) needs to be a playoff team.

A state champions and runner up are playing 60% of a FULL SEASON after that game. There are closer to as many playoff games as regular season games as not. Eight teams is the right number, I'm even willing to listen to 6 teams and the top 2 get a bye.
I vote for a top 8 with 4 weeks of playoffs. This way teams will have earned a playoff spot, the games for the most part will be more competitive and you can start the season late August early September. I don't like this middle of August start to the season.
 
If byes were forced on the top four by region, then the Monday of week 11 has no film review
a. You wait until Monday?

b. Why wouldn't you have film review of game 10?
What motivation exists to accept a bye, despite that, for a coach of a top four team?
a. Who wouldn't want a week to rest legs and allow bruises to heal?

b. I would still practice 2-3 days, do some basic non-contact, very limited full speed, drills. Give the kids a 1-2 well deserved days off.

c. Since you're not playing Friday you can go live scout your week 12 opponent. That's a huge advantage.
 
a. You wait until Monday?

b. Why wouldn't you have film review of game 10?
Who waits until the Monday after to review the previous game? (edit: I see the confusion. By 'review' in this context, I'm referring to watching the film of the upcoming opponent. Review as in watching as a team since most film exchanges through Hudl aren't accomplished until after the Saturday team session -- they'll get distributed to the team through the Hudl app before Monday. Monday would be the first opportunity to view it over as one unit, but it shouldn't be the first time all the kids in the room are seeing their upcoming opponent's tape.)

chs1971 said:
a. Who wouldn't want a week to rest legs and allow bruises to heal?
I suppose it depends if a coach prioritizes routine over rest!

getting healthy. everyone is banged up by week 10, some more than others. some teams may need the bye and some may not, so i think you do a draw and give the top 4 teams an opportunity to take it or not, then pass it down by seed.
Sure. If there’s the liberty to take or decline the bye (decline = pass it down like you said) then there’s likely more support for the concept!
 
Last edited:
a. You wait until Monday?
There are many teams that wait until Monday to review the previous game film... and there are many that don't, for equally valid reasons. When I played at Walsh Jesuit, we had guys coming from University Heights, Medina, Stark County, Ravenna, and all parts in between. Given that a lot of guys had Saturday jobs, and many of the juniors/sophomores had JV, meeting on Saturday wouldn't have made sense, for numerous logistical reasons. And being a Catholic school, Sunday was out of the question. However, a smaller local public could much more easily do a Saturday film session. It all depends on the proverbial "cards" that you're dealt.
 
a. You wait until Monday?

b. Why wouldn't you have film review of game 10?

a. Who wouldn't want a week to rest legs and allow bruises to heal?

b. I would still practice 2-3 days, do some basic non-contact, very limited full speed, drills. Give the kids a 1-2 well deserved days off.

c. Since you're not playing Friday you can go live scout your week 12 opponent. That's a huge advantage.
Chs

He doesn't understand the concept of a bye.
 
by going 16 teams, they also cut a week of the preseason off. I think this hurts the quality of football being played, especially in the early season. It puts more pressure to get kids at all the summer camp days so you can hit your 5 acclimation days after July 10 or whatever it is, so you can more easily scrimmage that first week of August.

The biggest issue is this, when they split D1 because of enrollment disparity, it then led to 7 divisions, and D1 is still much smaller. Then, you add in covid and everyone getting in along with the greediness of generating revenue, etc.

I think that 8 is still ideal. I would say 12 is good but I think the top four seeds should get to choose if they want a bye or play the first round and that bye is then passed to the 5 seed and on down if others in the top 4 do not want a bye.

I think if you stay 16, then they need to evaluate going back to 6 divisions.

Maybe there will be traction to actually change the playoff system again to make it more agreeable between the OHSAA and the Member schools.

I also don't think every school should get in the tournament for sports like basketball, baseball, softball, soccer, etc. Especially now that they have rating systems for those sports.
The new D1 regions of made up of 17&18 teams is a killer in the 16 team playoff. Is it possible to have all other divisions go 16 or 12, and have D1 go back to 8. Half of their region is still qualifying.

Break down of D1 Regions 9 seed through 12 seed

R1 R2 R3 R4
9: 6-4 9: 5-5 9: 7-3 9: 7-3
10: 4-6 10: 4-6 10: 6-4 10: 5-5
11: 3-7 11: 2-8 11: 7-3 11: 4-6
12: 3-7 12: 3-7 12: 7-3 12: 4-6

Even if OHSAA goes to 12, you are still going to see 2,3,4 win teams in the playoffs for D1
 
keep it at 16 teams per region, why is football the only sport that teams have to qualify for the playoffs? we don't say anything when basketball teams go 1-21 and make the tournament and lose by 50. or a volleyball team drives 2 hours to lose 25-3, 25-5, 25-1 and be done in less in an hour.
 
keep it at 16 teams per region, why is football the only sport that teams have to qualify for the playoffs?
This is just a dumb argument. Football is the only high school sport where you can only play 1 game per week. Volleyball, soccer, basketball, baseball, softball all can have everyone make the tournament and get the tournament done quicker because they can play twice a week.
 
It needs to go back to at least 8 teams per region, 12 teams, I don’t know if I like the 1 week bye concept, some of your top teams are playing their best ball come week 8,9 and 10. Do you really want slow down your momentum and have your team sit a week and play a team that is coming off a game? That Lower seed in my opinion will have the advantage. (Most of the time)
-this generation is getting to soft. If you want something go out and EARN it. What accomplishment can you feel going 2-8, 3-7 and having to travel and play a Top seed at 10-0, 9-1? Bigger divisions Maybe in 1-3 have the better chance at an upset. But you get in your lower divisions it’s very unlikely. So far D7 DSJ a 15 seed has done it. That’s about it in the smaller divisions though
 
This is just a dumb argument. Football is the only high school sport where you can only play 1 game per week. Volleyball, soccer, basketball, baseball, softball all can have everyone make the tournament and get the tournament done quicker because they can play twice a week.
Other states have shortened the rest days between games for football in the postseason before. Not arguing for it, just pointing it out.
 
yer right, I don’t have an understanding of the concept of something that football coaches of good teams generally are not interested in being forced upon them.
Has an NFL team ever proposed a rule change that they not be "forced" to take a bye in the playoffs?

Boy are those NFL players, coaches, and general managers stupid.
 
It needs to go back to at least 8 teams per region, 12 teams, I don’t know if I like the 1 week bye concept, some of your top teams are playing their best ball come week 8,9 and 10. Do you really want slow down your momentum and have your team sit a week and play a team that is coming off a game? That Lower seed in my opinion will have the advantage. (Most of the time)
-this generation is getting to soft. If you want something go out and EARN it. What accomplishment can you feel going 2-8, 3-7 and having to travel and play a Top seed at 10-0, 9-1? Bigger divisions Maybe in 1-3 have the better chance at an upset. But you get in your lower divisions it’s very unlikely. So far D7 DSJ a 15 seed has done it. That’s about it in the smaller divisions though
If it is going to be 8, strength of schedule HAS to be included. To go along with DJS, Napoleon (5-5) was the 13 seed and beat #4 Lorain Clearview 49-0 and #5 Bay Village 28-0. Drew Pasteur had Napoleon winning both of those games based on his system.

I agree with not liking the bye in a 12 team format. I remember during the covid year, teams that lost the week after their bye liked to use that as their excuse on why they didn't win.

If they aren't going to use a system like Pasteur's, then I think you have to go 16. You then truly get the best 8 teams in the quarterfinals.
 
Has an NFL team ever proposed a rule change that they not be "forced" to take a bye in the playoffs?

Boy are those NFL coaches and general managers stupid.
Apples to oranges, just like it’d be apples to oranges for me to cite the top four seeds in the most recent CFP playoff going 0-4 in their games as an argument against byes.

Because while there is an issue of longer layoff, neither the pro nor college seasons are relatable to the seasons for squads largely composed of 16-17-18 year olds. Reasons not the least of which include the pros playing 17 games before playoffs and college ball being ~13 weeks before bowl season/CFP.
 
Didn't the OHSAA survey the coaches a number of years ago and implemented their plan despite overwhelming contrary consensus from the coaches? I may be mistaken.
 
This is just a dumb argument. Football is the only high school sport where you can only play 1 game per week. Volleyball, soccer, basketball, baseball, softball all can have everyone make the tournament and get the tournament done quicker because they can play twice a week.
gotta love taking opportunities away from kids!
 
If it is going to be 8, strength of schedule HAS to be included. To go along with DJS, Napoleon (5-5) was the 13 seed and beat #4 Lorain Clearview 49-0 and #5 Bay Village 28-0. Drew Pasteur had Napoleon winning both of those games based on his system.

I agree with not liking the bye in a 12 team format. I remember during the covid year, teams that lost the week after their bye liked to use that as their excuse on why they didn't win.

If they aren't going to use a system like Pasteur's, then I think you have to go 16. You then truly get the best 8 teams in the quarterfinals.
exactly why theyll keep it at 16... the cream rises to the top anyways
 
a. You wait until Monday?

b. Why wouldn't you have film review of game 10?

a. Who wouldn't want a week to rest legs and allow bruises to heal?

b. I would still practice 2-3 days, do some basic non-contact, very limited full speed, drills. Give the kids a 1-2 well deserved days off.

c. Since you're not playing Friday you can go live scout your week 12 opponent. That's a huge advantage.
Generally I agree with this statement but I remember one time that live scouting might have had a negative effect. This goes back to playoffs 2007, Marion Local was playing Indian Creek on a Saturday afternoon because Marion's girls volleyball team had a either a state final or semifinal game the evening before and the football game had been moved to the following afternoon to allow fans to attend both.

West Jefferson having beat West Liberty Salem the previous evening decided to take in this game seeing they drew the winner next Friday. I remember a good number of West Jeff students wearing their letterman jackets strolling in and sitting on the Marion side stands. They were undefeated and had just put a healthy beat down on a good West Liberty Salem team and feeling pretty good about themselves. Suffice to say they had a little less swagger when they left after watching maybe half of this 53-0 game.
 
I vote for a top 8 with 4 weeks of playoffs. This way teams will have earned a playoff spot, the games for the most part will be more competitive and you can start the season late August early September. I don't like this middle of August start to the season.
Co-State Champs?
 
If it is going to be 8, strength of schedule HAS to be included. To go along with DJS, Napoleon (5-5) was the 13 seed and beat #4 Lorain Clearview 49-0 and #5 Bay Village 28-0. Drew Pasteur had Napoleon winning both of those games based on his system.

I agree with not liking the bye in a 12 team format. I remember during the covid year, teams that lost the week after their bye liked to use that as their excuse on why they didn't win.

If they aren't going to use a system like Pasteur's, then I think you have to go 16. You then truly get the best 8 teams in the quarterfinals.
Ridiculous take concerning the bye. This isn't like the CFP where you get an extra two weeks off and you're sitting at home for nearly a month
 
Generally I agree with this statement but I remember one time that live scouting might have had a negative effect. This goes back to playoffs 2007, Marion Local was playing Indian Creek on a Saturday afternoon because Marion's girls volleyball team had a either a state final or semifinal game the evening before and the football game had been moved to the following afternoon to allow fans to attend both.

West Jefferson having beat West Liberty Salem the previous evening decided to take in this game seeing they drew the winner next Friday. I remember a good number of West Jeff students wearing their letterman jackets strolling in and sitting on the Marion side stands. They were undefeated and had just put a healthy beat down on a good West Liberty Salem team and feeling pretty good about themselves. Suffice to say they had a little less swagger when they left after watching maybe half of this 53-0 game.
i heard parkway claims that win too (since the mac won)
 
Apples to oranges, just like it’d be apples to oranges for me to cite the top four seeds in the most recent CFP playoff going 0-4 in their games as an argument against byes.

Because while there is an issue of longer layoff, neither the pro nor college seasons are relatable to the seasons for squads largely composed of 16-17-18 year olds. Reasons not the least of which include the pros playing 17 games before playoffs and college ball being ~13 weeks before bowl season/CFP.
No, more like Fugi to Gala.
 
gotta love taking opportunities away from kids!
The opportunity to lose by 50 to a team like Marion local, Liberty Center and Ironton. Just to name a few 1 seeded teams that breeze by their first game. DSJ was a 15 and their schedule proved why they made a little run they did. Not very often will you said that in the lower divisions.
 
gotta love taking opportunities away from kids!
Absolute BS argument. With the exception of the aforementioned 15-seed DSJ (which, as mentioned, their seeding was the result of their murder-face schedule), those 13-16 seeds have no business being there, and by and large, those kids don't even want to be there. Average margin of victory for 13-4 through 16-1 games is in the 30's according to a podcast cited on another thread. Can't imagine that's fun for anyone.
 
keep it at 16 teams per region, why is football the only sport that teams have to qualify for the playoffs?
There have been in the past other sports and still is at least one sport where not everyone qualifies for the playoffs/tournament. I am not sure what the status of boys ice hockey and lacrosse are presently but not everyone got in at one point. And boys tennis at present it is still the case, only in NEO.

By OHSAA rules there is a limitation on how many matches, sets et al you can play in one day. Because you can't play in snow, rain or other inclimate weather they have an alternate indoor site available, however this site is usually privately owned and operated so it is often a limiting factor. Certain parts of NEO are so densely populated and have so many schools in the area that it is impossible to include participants from every school because of the limit of how many matches one person can play in a day (and tournament) and the availability of the indoor courts. So for the beginning of tournament play you can play no more than four matches, which means the bracket is limited to 16 players or doubles teams at the inital level.

In OHSAA tennis, an individual player is limited to participating in a maximum of five standard six-game sets or three eight-game pro sets per day. Players are additionally limited to two standard matches per day and four matches per tournament/weekend. If a player exceeds this limit, they will forfeit any additional matches.

In OHSAA boys ice hockey, an individual player is limited to participating in two games per day on a Saturday or one game per day on a weekday unless special permission has been granted. No more than 35 games may be played in a season including tournament play.
 
Top