In considering Kellogg's place in the Ohio HS pantheon, how fair is it to consider his team's success? It may not be the decisive factor, but it also cannot be overlooked. Fairly to state or not, Lucas and LeBron played in the seven state finals their teams were eligible to play in; going a collective 5-2 in those games. Kellogg's Vikings reached the state tournament only one time, losing in the final; albeit with an epic performance by Kellogg that still stands the test of time!
https://www.news-herald.com/sports/clark-kelloggs-epic-51-point-g there ame-turns-40-and-continues-to-stand-test-of-time/article_5315bb54-4fe3-11e9-b698-0be42be71174.html
Still, there is something to be said about raising the level of play of your teammates. Both Lucas and LeBron seem to have done that. But when I think of Kellogg, I tend to think that yes, he was great, but he could have been better. Yes, he played on great teams, but they should have been better. Even his Ohio State career leaves me thinking there should have been more. Now part of that was coaching and part of that was the beginnings of the chronic knee condition that dramatically shortened his pro career, but part of that was on him, too.
As far as high school goes, a strong case can be made that he laid the foundation for the success that the St. Joe's program enjoyed after he went on to Columbus. And that is a BIG plus in his favor. Still, if you consider team success at all, then while Kellogg is absolutely a Top 5 player in Ohio HS history, he is IMO solidly #3 behind Lucas and James.