Ohio's current football playoffs.

The playoffs should be left at 8 and is best. I2 with the top 4 getting a bye is ok, but not best. The biggest difference for school in Ohio is where they draw their students from. There should be an Open division and Standard division. Open is for schools that pull from anywhere in the county, state, or country. The standard is for schools that only draw from a distinct drawn out boundary. There could also be considerations for percentage of students who didn't come from the feeder schools in that district.
The problem is high school coaches have petitioned on different occasions of doing exactly what you are talking about separate playoffs and divisions for private/ parochial schools vs public schools. It has been voted down by a wide margin every time.
 
I disagree with the first sentence partly because, on its face, the decision to go OE or not doesn't factor in athletics. At least that is what Canton City Schools just said last month when they decided to go OE, lol. Even then, it's unknown how much utility there is to have athletics drive that decision.

Setting aside my OCC chest-beating, the conference comprises half of the non-OE Division 1 as is. The vast majority below (Centerville, Mentor, Winton Woods and Wayne aside) frankly aren't contenders for a football state title in a separated tournament.

Using 2024 Divisions and Regions, with this spreadsheet from the ODE as a reference on OE status https://education.ohio.gov/getattac...nt-Certification-Listing.xlsx.aspx?lang=en-US...

Division I (non-OCC)
Region 1
Berea
Brunswick
Cleveland Hts
Jackson
Medina
Mentor
Parma
Perrysburg
Strongsville (9)

Region 2
Beavercreek
Centerville
Fairmont
Lebanon
Northmont
Springboro
Wayne (7)

Region 3
Watkins Memorial (1)

Region 4
Colerain
Oak Hills
Sycamore
Winton Woods (4)

against

Division 1 (OCC)

Region 2
Dublin x2
Hilliard x3
South-Western x2 (7)

Region 3
Gahanna
Groveport
Olentangy x4
Pickerington x2
Reynoldsburg
Westerville x3
Worthington
Upper Arlington (14)

I personally would take the OCC vs the field in a hypothetical "non-OE D1" postseason. Of the four non-OCC schools I listed as being as potential contenders: Centerville hasn't made a state title game in 30+ years, Mentor is 0-2 versus the non-OE OCC in the final week, Wayne is ??? anymore these days, and Winton Woods would be the most likely to upend an OCC team in a typical strong year for the Warriors IMO.





One would say it's conjecture to infer that some internal policies on intra-district enrollment are driven by athletics instead of non-athletic reasons like redistricting, continuation of feeder-> high school attendance when lines are redrawn/when families move to a different part of the district, and permissions are granted to attend a different high school based on different academic programming offered at the desired high school from that of the assigned high school. (Also no such thing as "open enrollment lite" despite the fact that's what you want to call it, since it makes no sense the idea you're trying to conjure as you'd still have to live in the district to begin with.)
OE is a tool to get kids in seats that would not normally be there. That means more money for the district and most have an application/criteria you must meet to get that OE spot. I would like to know what that criteria is. Would OCC schools win many of the championship as laid out above, sure, but I don't think that is a reason not to do something.
I am simply saying with intra-district enrollment there has to be a way to account for that teams access to more students. Sure if a kid moves into a new part of district then they are going to that school. But if you are at Westerville Central and you could have kids transfer into your school that would be going to Westerville South OR North then that is an advantage over a school that draws from a smaller area, say Hillard Darby who can't pull from the whole district. Funny note...why is Westerville North farther south than Central?
 
OE is a tool to get kids in seats that would not normally be there. That means more money for the district and most have an application/criteria you must meet to get that OE spot. I would like to know what that criteria is. Would OCC schools win many of the championship as laid out above, sure, but I don't think that is a reason not to do something.
I am simply saying with intra-district enrollment there has to be a way to account for that teams access to more students. Sure if a kid moves into a new part of district then they are going to that school. But if you are at Westerville Central and you could have kids transfer into your school that would be going to Westerville South OR North then that is an advantage over a school that draws from a smaller area, say Hillard Darby who can't pull from the whole district. Funny note...why is Westerville North farther south than Central?
Central was built about 30 years after Westerville split into North/South, to service the booming Genoa Twp side of the district. It probably should’ve been called Westerville East, but alas!
 
The problem is high school coaches have petitioned on different occasions of doing exactly what you are talking about separate playoffs and divisions for private/ parochial schools vs public schools. It has been voted down by a wide margin every time.
Probably because the OHSAA feels like someone/lawyer will sue and call it discrimination. So they don't want the hassle.
 
IMO I think 12 teams making the playoffs per region is the perfect amount. Let the top 4 seeds have a bye, and then 5 vs 12, 6 vs 11, etc etc.. I think this will make it that everyone who deserves to be in gets in.

HOWEVER, the OHSAA will not be reducing the amount of teams that make the playoffs anytime soon. It is much much more likely that Ohio follows what Indiana does and lets everyone in and makes the regular season 9 games instead.
 
IMO I think 12 teams making the playoffs per region is the perfect amount. Let the top 4 seeds have a bye, and then 5 vs 12, 6 vs 11, etc etc.. I think this will make it that everyone who deserves to be in gets in.

HOWEVER, the OHSAA will not be reducing the amount of teams that make the playoffs anytime soon. It is much much more likely that Ohio follows what Indiana does and lets everyone in and makes the regular season 9 games instead.
So take a gate/$$$ from schools for losing a home game going to 9? I’m sure that’ll go over well.
 
The same year that Winton Woods missed (2019), in D5R18 there was the incident where Lutheran East’s week nine game versus 1-6 D7 Mathews conveniently was cancelled the week of. Mathews would go on to play a different opponent that week, while LE sat idle.

I bet Lutheran East was surprised to learn that the cancellation of that game was enough to propel them into the playoffs, leapfrogging (thereby eliminating) 10-0 Northwood. They were probably more shocked to learn afterwards that had they played Mathews, they themselves would’ve been eliminated (because the L2’s weren’t there) with the original L2 divisor applied. Whether or not Northwood deserved to qualify for playoffs… who knows… but it was apparent there was little incentive for teams to play their original schedule (or play ten games to begin with) under the previous format if it meant putting their playoff ambitions in peril.

Same thing happened to Liberty Center in 1997. A late season non conference game against Ottawa Hills was canceled, and the lowered L2 divisor is what got LC in the playoffs.

They went on to win the state title.
 
Well if you watch the that podcast you have a bunch of small school teams that are pretty good and will always make the playoffs in an 8 (Delta being the exception) team format.
I think most the people that favor 8 teams are teams that don't want to lose early in the playoffs or teams that play easy nonleague schedule and play in a league they will finish in the top 2 every year. They are always in so of course they want 8.
We play a national schedule because most teams in Ohio refuse to play us. If we would have lost one more game we are out of the top 8, but were able to make the final 4. So if 8 is the number teams just don't schedule good teams and some of the best teams have a very good chance to be left out. I think 12 is the perfect number these days with the fear some coaches have with scheduling. You should not get rewarded for playing a paper schedule.

The co-host of this podcast is from Liberty Center. Go to Joe Eitel and look at their schedule. All but one of their scores looks like a 1 vs. 16 game. They should not be complaining. 11 of their games they won by 30+ points. Why is that ok in the regular season, but not round 1 of the playoffs. Their starters should be more than rested.

Patrick Henry coach on Podcast. At least he scheduled a tough non league game and played Liberty Center tough, but look at the rest of the schedule. 9 games of 28+ point victories. So their season was mostly 2 vs. 15 scores.

Delta coach, same league. I give him credit. His team finished 13th and he still says 8 teams. Heck he lost on OT round 1 playoff game. I think the ohter two just drugged him and took with them to give them balance.

Eastwood. Seems to be a consistent winner 1-2 in their league. 6 wins of over 40 points. By the looks-6 automatic wins every year. 1 tough non-conference game 2 automatic non-conference wins=8 wins. Top 8 every year.

I think 8 would reward teams that play these types of schedules and would create more teams like them. Lets do what encourages teams to set up good games during the regular season, not 1 vs. 16 games in the regular season.
 
IMO I think 12 teams making the playoffs per region is the perfect amount. Let the top 4 seeds have a bye, and then 5 vs 12, 6 vs 11, etc etc.. I think this will make it that everyone who deserves to be in gets in.

HOWEVER, the OHSAA will not be reducing the amount of teams that make the playoffs anytime soon. It is much much more likely that Ohio follows what Indiana does and lets everyone in and makes the regular season 9 games instead.
I don’t fully agree here. They ruffled feathers adding the 6th official and demanding that schools must pay that extra official the same amount. You cannot make all of this revenue and hit your members with more expenses. I think the OHSAA either reduces to 12 or is forced to begin giving money back to the schools
 
You realize the entitled generation in every sense was the late boomer/early X right?

They're in charge and made these rules. They decided their kids needed trophies no matter what.
Exactly I don't care who you blame but it's not the kids because they did not hand out the participation trophies
 
Better suggestion? To me the Harbin system blows and is very flawed. Garbage in, garbage out.
Harbin is flawed but at least you know what you need to do to make the playoffs. If we are just letting the OHSAA pick the teams they want at the end of they year then no one knows what is required to make the playoffs. IMO setting a win threshold and then drawing names from a hat based on that would be better than just letting the OHSAA decide.
 
Well if you watch the that podcast you have a bunch of small school teams that are pretty good and will always make the playoffs in an 8 (Delta being the exception) team format.
I think most the people that favor 8 teams are teams that don't want to lose early in the playoffs or teams that play easy nonleague schedule and play in a league they will finish in the top 2 every year. They are always in so of course they want 8.
We play a national schedule because most teams in Ohio refuse to play us. If we would have lost one more game we are out of the top 8, but were able to make the final 4. So if 8 is the number teams just don't schedule good teams and some of the best teams have a very good chance to be left out. I think 12 is the perfect number these days with the fear some coaches have with scheduling. You should not get rewarded for playing a paper schedule.

The co-host of this podcast is from Liberty Center. Go to Joe Eitel and look at their schedule. All but one of their scores looks like a 1 vs. 16 game. They should not be complaining. 11 of their games they won by 30+ points. Why is that ok in the regular season, but not round 1 of the playoffs. Their starters should be more than rested.

Patrick Henry coach on Podcast. At least he scheduled a tough non league game and played Liberty Center tough, but look at the rest of the schedule. 9 games of 28+ point victories. So their season was mostly 2 vs. 15 scores.

Delta coach, same league. I give him credit. His team finished 13th and he still says 8 teams. Heck he lost on OT round 1 playoff game. I think the ohter two just drugged him and took with them to give them balance.

Eastwood. Seems to be a consistent winner 1-2 in their league. 6 wins of over 40 points. By the looks-6 automatic wins every year. 1 tough non-conference game 2 automatic non-conference wins=8 wins. Top 8 every year.

I think 8 would reward teams that play these types of schedules and would create more teams like them. Lets do what encourages teams to set up good games during the regular season, not 1 vs. 16 games in the regular season.
You are failing to recognize a couple of facts to this conversation.

1) your league schedule is your league schedule. You typically can't change that. Many of these 1-4 vs 13-16 matchups in playoff week 1 are rematches of the regular season

2) the group working on this surveyed coaches from all over Ohio with different levels of success. There is a broad feeling of concern about the current 16 team format from successful and unsuccessful programs alike.

3) there are many schools that have cultural problems in the football program, in the athletic department, in the school and in their community. They don't care about football or don't know how to fix their problems. They go 3-7 every year and get their brains beat in during the first round. They don't want to be there and don't deserve to be there. This happens in all seven divisions. They would rather have their season be over. They are culturally broken. An opportunity to be a 13-16 seed isn't going to help fix their problems.
 
Last edited:
Well if you watch the that podcast you have a bunch of small school teams that are pretty good and will always make the playoffs in an 8 (Delta being the exception) team format.
I think most the people that favor 8 teams are teams that don't want to lose early in the playoffs or teams that play easy nonleague schedule and play in a league they will finish in the top 2 every year. They are always in so of course they want 8.
We play a national schedule because most teams in Ohio refuse to play us. If we would have lost one more game we are out of the top 8, but were able to make the final 4. So if 8 is the number teams just don't schedule good teams and some of the best teams have a very good chance to be left out. I think 12 is the perfect number these days with the fear some coaches have with scheduling. You should not get rewarded for playing a paper schedule.

The co-host of this podcast is from Liberty Center. Go to Joe Eitel and look at their schedule. All but one of their scores looks like a 1 vs. 16 game. They should not be complaining. 11 of their games they won by 30+ points. Why is that ok in the regular season, but not round 1 of the playoffs. Their starters should be more than rested.

Patrick Henry coach on Podcast. At least he scheduled a tough non league game and played Liberty Center tough, but look at the rest of the schedule. 9 games of 28+ point victories. So their season was mostly 2 vs. 15 scores.

Delta coach, same league. I give him credit. His team finished 13th and he still says 8 teams. Heck he lost on OT round 1 playoff game. I think the ohter two just drugged him and took with them to give them balance.

Eastwood. Seems to be a consistent winner 1-2 in their league. 6 wins of over 40 points. By the looks-6 automatic wins every year. 1 tough non-conference game 2 automatic non-conference wins=8 wins. Top 8 every year.

I think 8 would reward teams that play these types of schedules and would create more teams like them. Lets do what encourages teams to set up good games during the regular season, not 1 vs. 16 games in the regular season.

LC actually schedules as good as anyone in NW Ohio....

Tinora- yearly conference title contender, routinely in the running for top 8

Napoleon- 2 whole divisions bigger than them by raw numbers, even in a down period now wins 5-7 games yearly

Otsego- Has had 2 losing regular seasons in the last decade, and one was 2015. Like Tinora, usually in the discussion for top 8 in their region.

They've now replaced Napoleon with Eastwood.

LC is also the 3rd smallest school in terms of straight up boys enrollment in their league. They're CONSTANTLY playing up and STILL dominant. So making it seem like "they beat everyone by 30 so they just purposely avoid challenges" is flat out wrong.

PH plays Grove. Hicksville hasn't been good in almost 10 years. Ayersville has their moments, but when they're bad they're awful.

Next you'll say Marion Local plays no one because their closest game was 21 points 😂
 
I don't care if it's 8, 12, 16, or 32 teams... 16 weeks is too long of a season.
Before the playoff expansion, wasn't it 3 scrimmages - 10 weeks reg season - 5 playoff games? Now it is 2 scrimmages and 6 playoff games. I thought they took away a scrimmage to accommodate the extra week of playoffs.
 
Been saying this over 10 years now.
Just take Top 32 in points in each division, no regions. Top 16 host week 1. Obviously OHSAA doesn’t care about travel distances. Maybe if over “X miles or drive time” let schools decide if a nutural site is needed.

What ever computers points format is used for seeding. just make sure there is no human bias in the formula. I’m fine with the Harbon points formula, not perfect but over all good.
 
Before the playoff expansion, wasn't it 3 scrimmages - 10 weeks reg season - 5 playoff games? Now it is 2 scrimmages and 6 playoff games. I thought they took away a scrimmage to accommodate the extra week of playoffs.
There were 3 weeks that you could scrimmage prior to the playoff expansion, and the 3rd had to be a "jamboree" played like a game. Some teams took advantage of all 3 weeks, most that I know of only used 2. Our school never had 3 scrimmages - just the standard 2 in the 2 weeks prior to the season starting. For a long time Grove scrimmaged Liberty Center, it was always Grove's second scrimmage and LC's third, so it had to be the jamboree style. The last time that I went before they stopped scrimmaging, they played 1 half of live varsity with a running clock, then the second half was all or mostly JV and freshmen, so it ended up being shorter than a standard scrimmage anyway
 
There were 3 weeks that you could scrimmage prior to the playoff expansion, and the 3rd had to be a "jamboree" played like a game. Some teams took advantage of all 3 weeks, most that I know of only used 2. Our school never had 3 scrimmages - just the standard 2 in the 2 weeks prior to the season starting. For a long time Grove scrimmaged Liberty Center, it was always Grove's second scrimmage and LC's third, so it had to be the jamboree style. The last time that I went before they stopped scrimmaging, they played 1 half of live varsity with a running clock, then the second half was all or mostly JV and freshmen, so it ended up being shorter than a standard scrimmage anyway
This seems to be the format I am seeing from our jamboree games recently.
 
LC actually schedules as good as anyone in NW Ohio....

Tinora- yearly conference title contender, routinely in the running for top 8

Napoleon- 2 whole divisions bigger than them by raw numbers, even in a down period now wins 5-7 games yearly

Otsego- Has had 2 losing regular seasons in the last decade, and one was 2015. Like Tinora, usually in the discussion for top 8 in their region.

They've now replaced Napoleon with Eastwood.

LC is also the 3rd smallest school in terms of straight up boys enrollment in their league. They're CONSTANTLY playing up and STILL dominant. So making it seem like "they beat everyone by 30 so they just purposely avoid challenges" is flat out wrong.

PH plays Grove. Hicksville hasn't been good in almost 10 years. Ayersville has their moments, but when they're bad they're awful.

Next you'll say Marion Local plays no one because their closest game was 21 points 😂

There is some rational thought that Marion Local is actually very well off playing the 16 week schedule. They dominate every game so starters really only play about half the time. They have far fewer two way players than most small schools, again, cutting down on injury chances by playing half the snaps of two way players. The backups get quality varsity experience playing half of every game, so they are ready when needed.

It's a rare situation, but IMO , Marion can handle the 16 weeks as they are currently built.

The flip side is when your team is not very good and you are a standout for your team. You play every snap and special teams. That ten week season is pretty long at that point.
 
There is some rational thought that Marion Local is actually very well off playing the 16 week schedule. They dominate every game so starters really only play about half the time. They have far fewer two way players than most small schools, again, cutting down on injury chances by playing half the snaps of two way players. The backups get quality varsity experience playing half of every game, so they are ready when needed.

It's a rare situation, but IMO , Marion can handle the 16 weeks as they are currently built.

The flip side is when your team is not very good and you are a standout for your team. You play every snap and special teams. That ten week season is pretty long at that point.
Plus the way Marion even practices, starters only take 50% or less of snaps and very few are 100% effort reps. This also helps get kids ready for when they are starters. Marion Local, basically, runs the same scheme year in and year out so it is mostly timing stuff to get worked out on Offense. Side note....how many programs run plays with their QB as a lead blocker? I remember seeing them in 2012-2013 running Super Power with Adam Bertke(Pitt recruit) running lead blocker and thinking how crazy that was.
 
There is some rational thought that Marion Local is actually very well off playing the 16 week schedule. They dominate every game so starters really only play about half the time. They have far fewer two way players than most small schools, again, cutting down on injury chances by playing half the snaps of two way players. The backups get quality varsity experience playing half of every game, so they are ready when needed.

It's a rare situation, but IMO , Marion can handle the 16 weeks as they are currently built.

The flip side is when your team is not very good and you are a standout for your team. You play every snap and special teams. That ten week season is pretty long at that point.
I think you could say the same thing for Liberty Center. I just looked it up on Joe Eitel, the last two years they have had 16 40+ wins. Those starters aren't playing 16 full games a season. I think I saw someone post that they have 70+ kids on the roster as well. I would assume they can go pretty deep on the depth chart.
 
In 88 Akron Ellet beat D2 Buchtel but Ellet finished 21st in their region.
If I remember correctly Ellet took Buchtel to triple OT in 87 before losing to the eventual state champs. Ellet really got up for Buchtel games back then. I think a lot had to do with bussing in Akron at the time, a good chunk of west Akron kids were bussed to Ellet and suited up for them. These were kids that played pee wee football for the West Griffins and South Rangers, traditional Buchtel feeder teams, and were forced to attend Ellet. Kids like Grandville Weems that lived 4 blocks from Buchtel's front door on the west side was bussed passed the east side to Ellet. A lot to unpack from that time period.
 
If I remember correctly Ellet took Buchtel to triple OT in 87 before losing to the eventual state champs. Ellet really got up for Buchtel games back then. I think a lot had to do with bussing in Akron at the time, a good chunk of west Akron kids were bussed to Ellet and suited up for them. These were kids that played pee wee football for the West Griffins and South Rangers, traditional Buchtel feeder teams, and were forced to attend Ellet. Kids like Grandville Weems that lived 4 blocks from Buchtel's front door on the west side was bussed passed the east side to Ellet. A lot to unpack from that time period.

I know Buchtel beat Ellet in 87, I didn't think it was in 3OT but I know Buchtel beat them, as the Griffs only loss in 87 came to Cincinnati Moeller in week 3. The only reason I remember that is I saw Ursuline beat Moeller at YSU in week 2 of the 1987 season after Moeller had lost to Colerain in week 1. At the time, to my knowledge, Moeller had never started a season 0-3 so I was watching for the result of that week 3 game.
 
Plus the way Marion even practices, starters only take 50% or less of snaps and very few are 100% effort reps. This also helps get kids ready for when they are starters. Marion Local, basically, runs the same scheme year in and year out so it is mostly timing stuff to get worked out on Offense. Side note....how many programs run plays with their QB as a lead blocker? I remember seeing them in 2012-2013 running Super Power with Adam Bertke(Pitt recruit) running lead blocker and thinking how crazy that was.
Copied that from DSJ.
 
Top