Sounds like a true "get off my lawn" guy. I recognize these views
. However...
1. John Q. Citizen wants to be able to use his/her phone while driving. You/we can rail against it all we want, but it's the way of the world. Those who think big thoughts about laws have to accept that drivers WILL use their phones and factor it into law-making. And, with the onset of truly smart cars, there will be a natural movement in the direction of giving the driver more leeway in the "pay attention" realm...whether we like it or not.
2. It's a bad law because it's so riddled with exceptions that the public isn't really on notice as to what is legal/illegal. If you read about it...it was carved up in the legislating process. The "we've got to have something" crowd got their something...a mess, I think.
3. I disagree with this idea by Red14 that cops won't pull people over for using their cell-phone. The hell they won't. Cops operate on hunches. I'd say most of the time, their hunch is valid. But, there's this thing called the 4th Amendment. They need "probable cause" that a crime has been committed to pull that suspicious car over going east on the Ohio Turnpike with a California plate and three guys who look Mexican. So, the hunch will be about drug smuggling, but the excuse to pull the car over will be the cell law. A cell phone law will come in very handy to them....just like the "marijuana smell" carve out that permits police to search a car that smells of weed (which would go away-probably-if marijuana becomes legal in Ohio and federally).