23xTigers
Well-known member
My review of the St.Eds Scrimmage.....big but weak offensive line, small wide receivers and inexperienced QB led to a tough day for pups against unimpressive St eds ...mck defense wasnt bad but Eds did what they wanted running the football....Going to be a long year for the pups...wouldn't be suprised if Nate Moore puts up 101 on Mck Week 10
But...But...JJ said that McK was going to be a player in DI this year, with the talent they have under the direction of coach Wattley? What y
Ed's is deep. But remember what i said, scrimmages are 'fool's gold'. It is good we use these to grapple with the best in Ohio to find out what needs work, who is ready to step up, practicing, etc. But results mean absolutely nothing. And when the season starts, nobody will care we won or lost a scrimmage and looked bad/ good in doing so.
Our defense is learning a brand new way to play. It is always an evolution that takes time, no matter how good the coaching is. Kids who are playing unfamiliar schemes second guess themselves because everything is different. Guys are sometimes out of position and when plays start, tackling is less crisp, etc. St. Edward has been playing the same for years and everything for them is second nature. So all things considered, our guys did ok.
WHERE CHAMPIONS ARE MADE AND SUCCESS IS TRADITION
McK will be a player in DI this year, they have talent and coach Wattley will get the most out of that said talent. Thank God they were able to get rid of Reardon, he was holding the program back. Almost forgot to mention McK was able to somehow hire the DC away from TT. Unbelievable what they're doing over there in Dogtown.