Took me awhile to find the game. Youtube has the whole thing now.End of regulation.
Are you basing that opinion on the ESPN video of the game? I hope you have a different view that shows it "plain as day" because the ESPN camera wasn't even close to showing whether there was contact or not.As for the call, the foul was low and plain as day and the ref in a clear side view.
Are you basing that opinion on the ESPN video of the game? I hope you have a different view that shows it "plain as day" because the ESPN camera wasn't even close to showing whether there was contact or not.
The KSU video at the game from the opposite baseline (zoomed in) showed no contact. Only saw it once at the game but it was pretty clear there was no foul.
Honestly, I'm not sure how anyone can say one way or the other whether he hit him based on the ESPN video.Got that one posted somewhere? It's worth a look. I don't see anything controversial. He hit him low. It's there, honest.
Do you dispute Carry got away with one on the inbounds?
overlooking an unnecessary foul makes no sense, let alone what was obviously an intentional one. No, I think it just wasn't called without a whole lot of thinking behind it. If that non-call gives Kent fans an emotional reason to believe the refs knew the other call was wrong? They shouldn't need it after a win but let them have it.Honestly, I'm not sure how anyone can say one way or the other whether he hit him based on the ESPN video.
Not sure what KSU does with their videos but it was a much better angle and didn't appear to show contact. With only one quick view, it's tough to say but there is no doubt that it was a controversial call.
Carry absolutely got away with that one. It would be interesting to find out if the officials overlooked it because they knew they blew the 3-point call. Of course, don't make the bad call at such a crucial point in the game and that push-off is irrelevant.
Well, we get the best two teams in the MAC final. I think Toledo is the better team but they don't exactly have a great history in the MAC tournament.
13th and fairly local but against a B12 with similar style and metrics. Kent is dangerous but might not get a match-up they can leverage against higher ranked players.Curious to see where they seed Kent and where they send them. I'm betting on a 12 or 13 all of the way across the country.
They'd switched to this increasingly the last 5-8 games. It was like they were trying to add a component to their game. Fault goes on the coach, as he has refused to develop his bigs. With the injury to Cochran, they have zero space eaters. Even he was only 6'1" but wide and strong and could leverage space in the paint against taller and bigger players.That had to be a frustrating end for the Toledo fans. I don't think they had a 3 pass possession in the last 12 minutes. It was like they panicked and decided to go one on one every possession.
Kent was shooting better than Toledo. But they outscored Toledo 44 - 26 in the paint. Toledo did a really poor job switching on D.They'd switched to this increasingly the last 5-8 games. It was like they were trying to add a component to their game. Fault goes on the coach, as he has refused to develop his bigs. With the injury to Cochran, they have zero space eaters. Even he was only 6'1" but wide and strong and could leverage space in the paint against taller and bigger players.
Kent pushed them around first game, physically just punching and elbowing into the chest, off the ball, particulalry against Shumate, an undersized, playing outside his natural skill set position post. Refs did not make the calls. Did it also last night. It's again on the coach for not putting the refs minds on it. On a player by player match-up, Kent is not the match of Toledo. But they have better talent balance and better defensive scheme.
Superior job all around by Kent's coach.
Shooting better or getting open looks? It was open looks. Dennis started a bit slow for Dennis. Other than that, nothing that wouldn't be accounted for the Kent's Defense.Kent was shooting better than Toledo. But they outscored Toledo 44 - 26 in the paint. Toledo did a really poor job switching on D.
Kent shot a better percentage on 2 pointers and on 3 pointers than Toledo. Toledo didn't do a good job of switching on D which resulted in Kent getting more open shots. Are we stating the same thing?Shooting better or getting open looks? It was open looks. Dennis started a bit slow for Dennis. Other than that, nothing that wouldn't be accounted for the Kent's Defense.
Yes. I think so as far as Kent is concerned. Toledo actually played their game on D. Which of course is a failed plan. The coach doesn't seem to realize that good guards can find open guys with their eyes closed, literally. Offenses are designed that way. But he collapses on the ball anyhow, even if it means leaving half a court undefended.Kent shot a better percentage on 2 pointers and on 3 pointers than Toledo. Toledo didn't do a good job of switching on D which resulted in Kent getting more open shots. Are we stating the same thing?
Missed the Layups 101 class.Kent state failed tonight.