Why because they beat Lake?Way to go Bulldogs!! The Pups are going to be a tough out come tournament time.
Why because they beat Lake?Way to go Bulldogs!! The Pups are going to be a tough out come tournament time.
The only thing I know about Lake this year is they are very consistent at being inconsistent.Final
McKinley 53
Lake 34
Suburban League national 5 0.Congrats to Stow on the win. Hoping for a rematch in the tournament.
It’s incredible. This team could either be one and done in the tourney or make a run. I’m so confused lol.The only thing I know about Lake this year is they are very consistent at being inconsistent.
Well when the county's leading scorer sits most of the game cause of fouls. I think he had 3 a few minutes into the 2nd quarter.Lake had no chance in this game. He has to play smarter, he is what makes this team go. He isn't out there and it's a completely different team.The only thing I know about Lake this year is they are very consistent at being inconsistent.
Good call. It's usually very low scoring when these two play, so first team to 40 should win
And that gets you what?Suburban League national 5 0.
What will you say if they beat Jackson? They almost beat them last time.Why because they beat Lake?
What will you say if they lose again?What will you say if they beat Jackson? They almost beat them last time.
According to The Repository this has at least one mistake. They say GlenOak is NOW 5-2 after last night's win over Perry.Conference Only
Lake (5-2)
Jackson (5-2)
GlenOak (5-2)
Green (4-3)
Hoover (3-4)
McKinley (3-4)
Perry (0-7)
Big week for the streaks.NEXT WEEK'S GAMES
TUE 1/24
Green @ Hoover
Lake @ Jackson
McKinley @ GlenOak
Perry @ Dover
FRI 1/27
Lake @ Green
GlenOak @ Hoover
Perry @ McKinley
Sat 1/28
Jackson @ Aurora
Lol,they didn't struggle as bad the 1st game? They easily could've beat McKinley the 1st game. They also pounded Glenoak who put a beat down on McKinley. They are quick. Where do you come up with this stuff? Oh wait I know! I'll just keep it to myself.Congrats to the Pups on what some called a "must win". McK quicker and more aggressive and was just the better team. Lake's "inconsistency" shows against quicker opponents.
Was able to see the gory shooting stats: For the first 3 quarters, Green was 4 for 36. (11 %) 13 for 57 for the game. (23%) Stow was a whopping 29%.Bull Greendog nailed the score with his prediction of a low scoring, first team to 40 wins!
TrueIf you lost twice to this McKinley team, you’re probly not that good
Been watching Green open with Stow for years and they are, for some reason, low scoring boring nights. With that said I do think two long time defense first coaches have something to do with it as well as methodical offenses.Was able to see the gory shooting stats: For the first 3 quarters, Green was 4 for 36. (11 %) 13 for 57 for the game. (23%) Stow was a whopping 29%.
It depends how the game goes. It depends what the score is.What will you say if they lose again?
What does the score matter or how the game goes if they lose to them again? A loss is a loss... 2 losses is 2 losses.It depends how the game goes. It depends what the score is.
It's hard to beat someone 3 times.
I see too teams headed in different directions. I think Jackson takes them handily, but Lake always shows up for the Jackson game.What do you all think the score of the Jackson-Lake game will be? I say Jackson 58 Lake 52.
Wow....maybe it was just brutal defense by both teamsWas able to see the gory shooting stats: For the first 3 quarters, Green was 4 for 36. (11 %) 13 for 57 for the game. (23%) Stow was a whopping 29%.
The sad thing is that the game was not that slow paced. Stow pushes that ball a decent amount, and still scored 40.Been watching Green open with Stow for years and they are, for some reason, low scoring boring nights. With that said I do think two long time defense first coaches have something to do with it as well as methodical offenses.