OldSchoolPanther
Well-known member
Again, I said if you compare the score of those intent on going to college, it's roughly the same....and it is.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Enrollment Numbers 2020 - 2021
- Thread starter ElderHSfan02
- Start date
Again, I said if you compare the score of those intent on going to college, it's roughly the same....and it is.
eastside_purple
Well-known member
Okay trey. LolIt was - but it was also before the state delayed their vote. Once that happened, it became pretty obvious it's likely too late in the game to change anything this year, and those on the fence knew they'd likely get the voucher this year. That's why the number is drastically increasing late in the game.
eastside_purple
Well-known member
It likely isn’t if you know math, but the readiness scores on percentage of college kids needing remediation shows Elder kids are better prepared than most local schools and far better than Oak Hills.Again, I said if you compare the score of those intent on going to college, it's roughly the same....and it is.
OldSchoolPanther
Well-known member
It likely isn’t if you know math, but the readiness scores on percentage of college kids needing remediation shows Elder kids are better prepared than most local schools and far better than Oak Hills.
LOL - sure, if you compare Elder vs OH overall.
You keep doing that, and I keep telling you it's a terrible comparison. Compare college intent kids with college intent kids, and there's not much difference.
eastside_purple
Well-known member
It is data on college freshman from each school. LolLOL - sure, if you compare Elder vs OH overall.
You keep doing that, and I keep telling you it's a terrible comparison. Compare college intent kids with college intent kids, and there's not much difference.
OldSchoolPanther
Well-known member
What's most ironic is that you will defend all of this all day long, yet you didn't even send your kid to Elder, likely for some of the same reasons you are arguing for. LOL I'm fine with that choice, but your constant dismissal of my thoughts are really funny.
I have plenty of those PMs too. LOL
I have plenty of those PMs too. LOL
eastside_purple
Well-known member
Well, when you make up your own reality and facts; I’m sure fictitious people pm their support too. LolzWhat's most ironic is that you will defend all of this all day long, yet you didn't even send your kid to Elder, likely for some of the same reasons you are arguing for. LOL I'm fine with that choice, but your constant dismissal of my thoughts are really funny.
I have plenty of those PMs too. LOL
OldSchoolPanther
Well-known member
Well, when you make up your own reality and facts; I’m sure fictitious people pm their support too. Lolz
OK - lolz
eastside_purple
Well-known member
Trey ignored this post. Wonder why? LolzIt is data on college freshman from each school. Lol
The people that are not choosing Elder are the ones that are actually deciding to pay MORE for St X.
They see more value at X at a higher price point. What's that say?
Every family on the westside would send their kids to Elder if the pricetag was $7,000. At some point, which seems to be the $10-11K mark, value starts to come into question.
The families choosing X over Elder are also "X" families for the most part. It's a rare occurence that somebody from the westside who didnt attend X themselves or grow up as X families are sending their children to X. Sure it happens but it's not on some grandiose level.
He and the kid from Dryridge are going to Moeller for certain.Thought I saw St I's best basketball player in 8th Grade walking around in a Moeller sweatshirt last weekend. Not terribly surprising if so.