I did not state 24. I inadvertently typed that as I was creating an invoice at the time and that number was on my mind. That said, post about it on every thread for days like you do with Harry. Again, you and FishFraud find that hysterical.
You sure did state 24.....it's in writing. Ahhh, the old "I was creating an invoice" excuse. Don't the receipts just print after you put the order for tacos in?
I wrote it. I did not state it. I am also not excusing anything. It is not worthy of an excuse. I simply told you why I typed that number. How long you gonna post on this one? Maybe you can jump into the debt vs deficit gotya, too?
LOL, ok you still wrote it....How is one supposed to state something here without writing/typing it exactly? I'll post on this until you rake step on something else. Don't worry, it shouldn't take long....
Weeks after the story broke nothing is found...imagine that.
FBI finds no classified documents at Biden’s Rehoboth Beach home
Federal investigators on Wednesday found no documents with classified markings during a search of President Biden’s Rehoboth Beach, Del., home, his attorney said in a statement. The FBI conducted a…thehill.com
For the few documents where the classification actually matters they could describe the document with enough detail that we would know how the person taking it may or may not have benefited.
Then tried to use "redshirt" as a reason for not graduating in 4 years.
that is a insults to idiots
www.washingtonexaminer.com
nypost.com
That will all come out in time AFTER the investigations are complete. You really can't be serious. You want law enforcement to give detail about the evidence to the public in open investigations? That's not how it works.
Duh. I redshirted my first year. Every heard of it?Then tried to use "redshirt" as a reason for not graduating in 4 years.
I am very serious here. What strikes me as ludicrous is the idea that VP's & Presidents taking what are purported to be classified documents is just another criminal investigation. It isn't. It's a deeply political activity.
And what right do you think you have to the details of these documents from Trump, Biden, and Pence? Is it in the constitution? Why do you think you are owed knowing right here and right now? Do you think that you get to violate the rights of other Americans because you want to know when you want to know? HERE & NOW. WTF.
I don't know for sure but couldn't you sti have graduated in 4 years and been a grad student you're fifth year? Seems like we see that a lot nowadays. Maybe that wasn't as prevalent back then .
I could have. A few people did. At the time, I did not really think about going to grad school so after my freshman year, I started taking minimum loads. In the mid 80's, we did not take classes year around like they do now.
Enough with the fake hysterics. Violating the "rights of other Americans" is an interesting angle for denying transparency in government.
There is no hysterics. Rights granted and laws governing our land apply to every citizen whether they have served in government or not. Trump, Biden, and Pence are not above the law or below the law because of their elected office. Law enforcement is under no obligation to disclose the details of what is in any of those documents before conclusions are made about legal liability. Telling you what is in them in advance because you want to know if one is a bigger deal than the other does not factor and should never be the basis for evidentiary disclosure to the public. In typical fashion, you are for principles until they do not suit your POV.
This is gibberish and doesn't reflect the constitution. Law enforcement regularly discloses the details of criminal investigations when it's in the public good to do so. The amount of transparency in any criminal investigation is determined on a case by case basis. There are no constitutional rights restricting the flow of information in these cases.
That "gibberish" are principals of our legal system and the right to a fair trial. Releasing details of evidence to the public violates that in every possible way. Further, what public good is done by disclosing this now before they are finished with a decision? You just want to know because you have a political agenda.
Transparency is disclosing the nature of the documents taken so the public can better understand what if anything they stood to gain by taking those materials. This will not impact a fair trial in the extremely unlikely event a trial is ever held.
That you people are a-holes, obviously. Duh
Gotta get those ducks in a row.
Biden classified docs scandal fits ‘pattern of an influence operation’: Rep. James Comer
“The White House isn’t being truthful with the American people,” Republican Rep. James Comer said.
Becoming an influence peddling investigation .....................long, long overdue.
And you could have graduated in 4 or less.This is what amuses me … you come this conclusion based on what … nothing but what party they are … my bet is all of them don’t amount to a hill of beans … but you … Republicans good - Democrats bad … way of life.
