Central Buckeye Conference 2025

Having nothing to do with football but this issue is not limited to Clark and Champaign county. I just read a story out of Morgan county,the four districts there are in desperate shape. One, I believe Federal Hocking has already moved to terminate all 7 of the vocational positions and is preparing to cut to the state minimum. The three other districts in the county are preparing similar measures. This is an area of the state that has never been financially successful. The superintendent quoted sounded bitter.
 
I remember many years ago, Greenon was on a pay to play, I think was around $250 per kid. The football team ran a cow chip bingo. They raised over $10K, net, to cover costs for the football player costs. Then next thing I see are new uniforms, home and away jerseys and pants, ditching the red highlights....me thinking outside the box, those had to be ordered well in advance of having them on opening day. Now I see Alder in their unis and think back to when Greenon looked like that up to the early '00s...lol
The state needs to fund schools operating expenses and salaries with a consumption tax levied against everyone. The more you spend the more you pay. Use levies for construction and improvements. Guarantee the salaries of teachers to be above a living wage. They are the most important people in a school system. Coaches should be paid from gate receipts of each school and then bonused through their regular salary, based on results. Coaches are not paid enough for the work they put in and the crap they deal with. Just my opinion.
Property owners are saddled with too much and penalized for being a property owner. Eliminate taxing folks over 65. The younger generation needs to pay more since they are the ones with the young children. They are at the peak of their earning years.
I'm just a cranky old cuss and it just gets under my skin that schools have to go out for additional taxes from property owners, while using kids as a means to an end until that levy runs out, then we start over again. My example of the casino and lottery were just an example of the hundreds of millions of dollars that were supposed to be ear marked for schools and when I look at board meeting minutes and the financial reports, I fail to see a clearly divided input of those assets.

Living wage? What exactly is that? Just pulling the salary data for the Shawnee district (openpayrolls.com). The teacher salaries range between $63.7K to mostly $88.2K, with the Super pulling in $125K. The median OH income is $57K and $61K for Clark County. It appears Shawnee has a good base of salaries for their teachers. Then again, think about those teachers and tell me, how many of them become teachers because of the money?

Bad idea. Parents and for the most part, fans, are fair weather. To base a coach's stipend from gates and success is ridiculous. To me, coaches are the most undervalued assets in a school...no matter the sport or extracurricular. Example. I have gone to many games at Trotwood and if not for the visitor fan base TM would be in the red for their sports....just an observation. I went to a state semi game at Sidney against Toledo CC and there where less than 150 TM fans in the stands. Then I look at the CBC as a whole and I see London, Belle, KR, North Union and Urbana as the most solid home fan base of any of the schools. Basing stipends from gate receipts and success may decrease that $0.05 per hour by 50% for most schools. Where is the equity in that thought process?

That is a good one and being that age, I should be all on board but cannot disagree more. Why do you think people that are beyond school age kids should be exempted? ....you seem to have an opinion of it takes a village and if so, the whole damn village needs to participate to support their future or IMO move.
 
2025 CBC FOOTBALL DIVISIONS and ENROLLMENT W/ CB

D3- Bellefontaine (280), Tecumseh (336), London (268)

D4- Jonathan Alder (261), Kenton Ridge (259), Urbana (230), Shawnee (225), Ben Logan (220), Northwestern (205)

D5- North Union (173), Indian Lake (196), Graham (193)

Looks to be the exact same.

London is tied with two other schools as the smallest D3 in the state. Jonathan Alder and Kenton Ridge are both in the top 10 in D4 by enrollment after CB. Northwestern is near the bottom in terms of D4 enrollment.

Future CBC Members: Bethel (243) D4, Greenon (183) D5.
 
2025 CBC FOOTBALL DIVISIONS and ENROLLMENT W/ CB

D3- Bellefontaine (280), Tecumseh (336), London (268)

D4- Jonathan Alder (261), Kenton Ridge (259), Urbana (230), Shawnee (225), Ben Logan (220), Northwestern (205)

D5- North Union (173), Indian Lake (196), Graham (193)

Looks to be the exact same.

London is tied with two other schools as the smallest D3 in the state. Jonathan Alder and Kenton Ridge are both in the top 10 in D4 by enrollment after CB. Northwestern is near the bottom in terms of D4 enrollment.

Future CBC Members: Bethel (243) D4, Greenon (183) D5.
That makes sense, since Bethel will be in the Kenton Trail (hope I used that wording correctly, lol) and Greenon in the Mad River. Bethel will be freight trained over the next several years, while Greenon will probably hold their own and maybe a MRD winner in 3 or so years.

This should be a revisit conference in the next 3-5 years with Bethel possibly moving on and other local smaller schools looking to join. Hell, London and Alder may be looking beyond by then.

I really wish Milton Union luck getting into the CBC....IMO, they add so much and by that measure, I see the CBC downgrading into a D6-D4 conference before 2030....wow, writing 2030 is insane to me, lol.
 
2025 CBC FOOTBALL DIVISIONS and ENROLLMENT W/ CB

D3- Bellefontaine (280), Tecumseh (336), London (268)

D4- Jonathan Alder (261), Kenton Ridge (259), Urbana (230), Shawnee (225), Ben Logan (220), Northwestern (205)

D5- North Union (173), Indian Lake (196), Graham (193)

Looks to be the exact same.

London is tied with two other schools as the smallest D3 in the state. Jonathan Alder and Kenton Ridge are both in the top 10 in D4 by enrollment after CB. Northwestern is near the bottom in terms of D4 enrollment.

Future CBC Members: Bethel (243) D4, Greenon (183) D5.
Salad, explain this to this ...

Alder, #7 and KR #10 are the highest CBC DIV teams but DIII "PRE CB Division 2025-26", with 4 and 6, respectively, 2024-25 CB Numbers but still are aligned into D4. I get OHSAA adjusts division alignments but this seems skewed when they are by optics a D3 and numbers a D4. Bethel with a CB of ZERO, so there is an inherent growth in that district....look out.

Food for thought: previous years, two or so ago, Glenville had a CB of 0 and now they have 35 and are still D4...how? Many debated their numbers did not align to be D4 when in fact they should have been D3 or higher considering their participation from the Ginn Academy enrollment. How does a school go from zero to 35 and not have a divisional upgrade when they are top 20 or better in the CB count. Only NDCL, Bishop Ready, Fenwick, Lake Catholic and CHCA best them in CB numbers, this time around. Kind of odd for a public school.
 
Salad, explain this to this ...

Alder, #7 and KR #10 are the highest CBC DIV teams but DIII "PRE CB Division 2025-26", with 4 and 6, respectively, 2024-25 CB Numbers but still are aligned into D4. I get OHSAA adjusts division alignments but this seems skewed when they are by optics a D3 and numbers a D4. Bethel with a CB of ZERO, so there is an inherent growth in that district....look out.

Food for thought: previous years, two or so ago, Glenville had a CB of 0 and now they have 35 and are still D4...how? Many debated their numbers did not align to be D4 when in fact they should have been D3 or higher considering their participation from the Ginn Academy enrollment. How does a school go from zero to 35 and not have a divisional upgrade when they are top 20 or better in the CB count. Only NDCL, Bishop Ready, Fenwick, Lake Catholic and CHCA best them in CB numbers, this time around. Kind of odd for a public school.
My friend, I wish I knew myself lol. I’ve always chopped it up to weird OHSAA magic, that only they understand 🤣 but I agree, it’s definitely skewed.
 
I remember many years ago, Greenon was on a pay to play, I think was around $250 per kid. The football team ran a cow chip bingo. They raised over $10K, net, to cover costs for the football player costs. Then next thing I see are new uniforms, home and away jerseys and pants, ditching the red highlights....me thinking outside the box, those had to be ordered well in advance of having them on opening day. Now I see Alder in their unis and think back to when Greenon looked like that up to the early '00s...lol

I'm just a cranky old cuss and it just gets under my skin that schools have to go out for additional taxes from property owners, while using kids as a means to an end until that levy runs out, then we start over again. My example of the casino and lottery were just an example of the hundreds of millions of dollars that were supposed to be ear marked for schools and when I look at board meeting minutes and the financial reports, I fail to see a clearly divided input of those assets.

Living wage? What exactly is that? Just pulling the salary data for the Shawnee district (openpayrolls.com). The teacher salaries range between $63.7K to mostly $88.2K, with the Super pulling in $125K. The median OH income is $57K and $61K for Clark County. It appears Shawnee has a good base of salaries for their teachers. Then again, think about those teachers and tell me, how many of them become teachers because of the money?

Bad idea. Parents and for the most part, fans, are fair weather. To base a coach's stipend from gates and success is ridiculous. To me, coaches are the most undervalued assets in a school...no matter the sport or extracurricular. Example. I have gone to many games at Trotwood and if not for the visitor fan base TM would be in the red for their sports....just an observation. I went to a state semi game at Sidney against Toledo CC and there where less than 150 TM fans in the stands. Then I look at the CBC as a whole and I see London, Belle, KR, North Union and Urbana as the most solid home fan base of any of the schools. Basing stipends from gate receipts and success may decrease that $0.05 per hour by 50% for most schools. Where is the equity in that thought process?

That is a good one and being that age, I should be all on board but cannot disagree more. Why do you think people that are beyond school age kids should be exempted? ....you seem to have an opinion of it takes a village and if so, the whole damn village needs to participate to support their future or IMO move.
School funding could be settled. The state constitution requires schools be equitably funded. Let’s drop the property tax part because that can’t be equal. Property doesn’t have the same value from county to county. So fund the schools on a state basis with a set formula that can be adjusted to cover the problem of a poor district and still be fair to rich suburban residents.
 
Nothing to do with football but congrats to Shawnee basketball coach Chuck Martin on his retirement. Three hundred wins in any sport these days is a whole lot. He couldn’t have done it without the support of a good administrator,good parents and kids. But it’s a whole lot of credit to him.
 
School funding could be settled. The state constitution requires schools be equitably funded. Let’s drop the property tax part because that can’t be equal. Property doesn’t have the same value from county to county. So fund the schools on a state basis with a set formula that can be adjusted to cover the problem of a poor district and still be fair to rich suburban residents.
Rat, you and me and a dog named Boo know the difference between equity and equality and never has an equitable distribution been equality.

Again, it just irks me to see schools hitting the levies to fund our greatest resource.
 
Nothing to do with football but congrats to Shawnee basketball coach Chuck Martin on his retirement. Three hundred wins in any sport these days is a whole lot. He couldn’t have done it without the support of a good administrator,good parents and kids. But it’s a whole lot of credit to him.
Just glad to see the man step down under his own terms. Curious to see who is hired to fill his shoes and if the district has it right, as they do with DeLong, they should be in good shape.
 
I remember many years ago, Greenon was on a pay to play, I think was around $250 per kid. The football team ran a cow chip bingo. They raised over $10K, net, to cover costs for the football player costs. Then next thing I see are new uniforms, home and away jerseys and pants, ditching the red highlights....me thinking outside the box, those had to be ordered well in advance of having them on opening day. Now I see Alder in their unis and think back to when Greenon looked like that up to the early '00s...lol

I'm just a cranky old cuss and it just gets under my skin that schools have to go out for additional taxes from property owners, while using kids as a means to an end until that levy runs out, then we start over again. My example of the casino and lottery were just an example of the hundreds of millions of dollars that were supposed to be ear marked for schools and when I look at board meeting minutes and the financial reports, I fail to see a clearly divided input of those assets.

Living wage? What exactly is that? Just pulling the salary data for the Shawnee district (openpayrolls.com). The teacher salaries range between $63.7K to mostly $88.2K, with the Super pulling in $125K. The median OH income is $57K and $61K for Clark County. It appears Shawnee has a good base of salaries for their teachers. Then again, think about those teachers and tell me, how many of them become teachers because of the money?

Bad idea. Parents and for the most part, fans, are fair weather. To base a coach's stipend from gates and success is ridiculous. To me, coaches are the most undervalued assets in a school...no matter the sport or extracurricular. Example. I have gone to many games at Trotwood and if not for the visitor fan base TM would be in the red for their sports....just an observation. I went to a state semi game at Sidney against Toledo CC and there where less than 150 TM fans in the stands. Then I look at the CBC as a whole and I see London, Belle, KR, North Union and Urbana as the most solid home fan base of any of the schools. Basing stipends from gate receipts and success may decrease that $0.05 per hour by 50% for most schools. Where is the equity in that thought process?

That is a good one and being that age, I should be all on board but cannot disagree more. Why do you think people that are beyond school age kids should be exempted? ....you seem to have an opinion of it takes a village and if so, the whole damn village needs to participate to support their future or IMO move.
I think his point is just make sure teachers are paid enough in general that they aren't having to also go wait tables or work retail at night to make ends meet so they can dedicate that time to actually being better teachers.

I understand the attitude behind "people with kids should pay more because they are actually using the resource" but this idea never carries beyond school funding. I'm too young to benefit from Senior services but I still help to fund them. I go to the park maybe twice a year but still pay the same rate as someone who uses it daily. I have never needed the services of the FD, EMS, or Police but I still fund them at the same rate as someone who uses them regularly. We can certainly work to find other funding solutions but the idea of only the people who use the service funding it is never going to be the answer.
 
I understand the attitude behind "people with kids should pay more because they are actually using the resource" but this idea never carries beyond school funding. I'm too young to benefit from Senior services but I still help to fund them. I go to the park maybe twice a year but still pay the same rate as someone who uses it daily. I have never needed the services of the FD, EMS, or Police but I still fund them at the same rate as someone who uses them regularly. We can certainly work to find other funding solutions but the idea of only the people who use the service funding it is never going to be the answer.
While I’m sympathetic toward the idea of not taxing 65+, at its core the idea is just incompatible with two realities in our state: an aging population across wide swaths of exurban/rural Ohio, and promotion of taxpayer welfare toward non-public schools coming from the Statehouse (one whose composition is not changing anytime soon.)

Speaking to former point: while there are many 65+ with fixed income-flow amid otherwise dwindling wealth (to the point they’re barely above poverty if that), there’s also plenty who do have the assets to pay an extra xx dollars per 100k in their property taxes. Thinking less in terms of Corvettes/Red Barchettas, more in terms of additional real estate they own (be it inside the district, outside or out-of-state) where part of their personal wealth is. Regardless, it would not surprise me if 5-10 years from now the majority of small rural districts end up having taxpayer bases of 65+ comprise >50.1% of the residencies inside district boundaries.

As it relates to the latter reality: the flaw with the heightened libertarian argument on “only users should bear the cost of a public service” as a supposed solution to funding schools is this does not confer much confidence in having public schools to young people. Because it’s a nominally free service in that tuition to attend is not charged, but you already pay the taxes to support it. Thread in the idea of “young people should pay more as they are who use the service” (setting aside the longstanding conflict on which generations should be tasked to pay into things they don’t directly use) and suddenly the notion of the statehouse is green-lighting taxpayer money to defray the cost to attend SCC, Emmanuel Christian (with proposals to extend this to non-chartered/homeschools via educational savings accounts) takes on a whole new meaning to these parents.

It in essence galvanizes rhetoric toward the “Backpack Bill” idea that died on the vine a couple years ago in the state House, but could always return in 2027. Where that money you pay as a parent would instead be reappropriated to the private school your kids attend. It’s just one whale of a slippery slope.
 
While I’m sympathetic toward the idea of not taxing 65+, at its core the idea is just incompatible with two realities in our state: an aging population across wide swaths of exurban/rural Ohio, and promotion of taxpayer welfare toward non-public schools coming from the Statehouse (one whose composition is not changing anytime soon.)

Speaking to former point: while there are many 65+ with fixed income-flow amid otherwise dwindling wealth (to the point they’re barely above poverty if that), there’s also plenty who do have the assets to pay an extra xx dollars per 100k in their property taxes. Thinking less in terms of Corvettes/Red Barchettas, more in terms of additional real estate they own (be it inside the district, outside or out-of-state) where part of their personal wealth is. Regardless, it would not surprise me if 5-10 years from now the majority of small rural districts end up having taxpayer bases of 65+ comprise >50.1% of the residencies inside district boundaries.

As it relates to the latter reality: the flaw with the heightened libertarian argument on “only users should bear the cost of a public service” as a supposed solution to funding schools is this does not confer much confidence in having public schools to young people. Because it’s a nominally free service in that tuition to attend is not charged, but you already pay the taxes to support it. Thread in the idea of “young people should pay more as they are who use the service” (setting aside the longstanding conflict on which generations should be tasked to pay into things they don’t directly use) and suddenly the notion of the statehouse is green-lighting taxpayer money to defray the cost to attend SCC, Emmanuel Christian (with proposals to extend this to non-chartered/homeschools via educational savings accounts) takes on a whole new meaning to these parents.

It in essence galvanizes rhetoric toward the “Backpack Bill” idea that died on the vine a couple years ago in the state House, but could always return in 2027. Where that money you pay as a parent would instead be reappropriated to the private school your kids attend. It’s just one whale of a slippery slope.
Just reading your post, I had to cue up the Rush Moving Pictures album...yes, I still can play vinyl, to hear that song.

Need some clarification. From what I read about the Clark Shawnee SD proposal they are looking for money from a gross Income Tax Levy. I assume this is different than a property tax levy that renters are "excluded" but would be included under the proposal? As I see it, SDs with higher property owner (elderly) voters than renters seem to fail school levies. Is this an end around for the renters to actually contribute to the taxes the owners would otherwise incur on their taxes? If so, smart move on the CSSD.
I think his point is just make sure teachers are paid enough in general that they aren't having to also go wait tables or work retail at night to make ends meet so they can dedicate that time to actually being better teachers.

I understand the attitude behind "people with kids should pay more because they are actually using the resource" but this idea never carries beyond school funding. I'm too young to benefit from Senior services but I still help to fund them. I go to the park maybe twice a year but still pay the same rate as someone who uses it daily. I have never needed the services of the FD, EMS, or Police but I still fund them at the same rate as someone who uses them regularly. We can certainly work to find other funding solutions but the idea of only the people who use the service funding it is never going to be the answer.
As an old, retired, single guy, I eat out A LOOOTTTT and I have yet to meet a server, bar tender or busser that is an active school teacher. Many I have met that are still pursuing degrees in that field but not currently employed. Not doubting you or anyone that it exists but I have met more teachers on a beach in the Caribbean with a Pina Colada in hand with a JJA (June, July, August) mentality than not. My son is a school teacher. He struggled hiring on but picked up odd jobs within the school along with his stipend for coaching and made it work. Now, he his 15+ years into his career, a HC and making things work and able to enjoy his JJA..to an extent. Yes, I agree with your statement of not using services, yet, I vote YES, while being a renter for the school levies; however, my landlord votes NO and we cancel each other out. Finally, just a glance at the CSSD teacher salaries compared to local area and state wages, they should not be waiting tables to make ends meet.
 
Don’t forget that teachers are only getting paid for 9-months of work. The paychecks are spread out over 12 months. Just something most people don’t know.

Teachers shouldnt HAVE to get a 2nd job to make ends meet, IMHO if they do they aren’t very good with their money (I understand that at the beginning pay sucks).

The biggest block to teachers getting paid more is their unions. Bad teachers have the same representation, bargaining power, and rules as the good teachers. A good teacher can’t shop themselves around and make more money at a school that wishes to have better teachers because the union has made it where you get paid by years of services, not by how good of a teacher you are.

None of this has any bearing on the current discussion, I just wanted to let my thoughts out lol
 
Last edited:
Don’t forget that teachers are only getting paid for 9-months of work. The paychecks are spread out over 12 months. Just something most people don’t know.

Teachers shouldnt HAVE to get a 2nd job to make ends meet, IMHO if they do they aren’t very good with their money (I understand that at the beginning pay sucks).

The biggest block to teachers getting paid more is their unions. Bad teachers have the same representation, bargaining power, and rules as the good teachers. A good teacher can’t shop themselves around and make more money at a school that wishes to have better teachers because the union has made it where you get paid by years of services, not by how good of a teacher you are.

None of this has any bearing on the current discussion, I just wanted to let my thoughts out lol
Going to address the highlighted portions in reverse order.

The bad teachers are definitely a massive issue. I know of a school district that had to completely rework a department to cover for a bad teacher. It was not well received.

At this point, prospective teachers are almost better to take the extra year of school (and loans) to just get their Masters so they start further over on the pay chart.
 
I don't particularly follow the CBC, but this is from another thread on here.

CENTRAL BUCKEYE CONFERENCE
Kenton Trail Division

BELLEFONTAINE

1(H) Sidney
2@ Bellbrook
3@ Westerville Central
4@ Benjamin Logan
5(H) Indian Lake
6(H) Kenton Ridge
7(H) London
8@ Tecumseh
9(H) Urbana
10@ Jonathan Alder

JONATHAN ALDER
1@ West Liberty-Salem
2(H) Columbus Academy
3(H) Bloom-Carroll
4@ North Union
5(H) Springfield Shawnee
6@ Tecumseh
7(H) Urbana
8@ London
9@ Kenton Ridge
10(H) Bellefontaine

KENTON RIDGE
1(H) St. Paris Graham
2(H) Dayton Northridge
3@ Batavia
4@ Springfield Shawnee
5(H) Springfield Northwestern
6@ Bellefontaine
7(H) Tecumseh
8@ Urbana
9(H) Jonathan Alder
10@ London

LONDON
1@ New Albany
2(H) Chillicothe
3(H) Franklin Heights
4@ Indian Lake
5(H) St. Paris Graham
6@ Urbana
7@ Bellefontaine
8(H) Jonathan Alder
9@ Tecumseh
10(H) Kenton Ridge

SPRINGFIELD SHAWNEE
1(H) Greenon
2(H) Brookville
3@ Tecumseh
4(H) Kenton Ridge
5@ Jonathan Alder
6(H) Springfield Northwestern
7@ Indian Lake
8(H) St. Paris Graham
9@ North Union
10@ Benjamin Logan

TECUMSEH
1@ Fairborn
2@ Dayton Carroll
3(H) Springfield Shawnee
4@ Springfield Northwestern
5(H) Benjamin Logan
6(H) Indian Lake
7@ Kenton Ridge
8(H) Bellefontaine
9(H) London
10@ Urbana

Mad River Division

BENJAMIN LOGAN

1@ Bluffton
2(H) West Liberty-Salem
3@ Urbana
4(H) Bellefontaine
5@ Tecumseh
6@ St. Paris Graham
7(H) North Union
8(H) Indian Lake
9@ Springfield Northwestern
10(H) Springfield Shawnee

INDIAN LAKE
1@ Lima Bath
2(H) Fairbanks
3(H) Allen East
4(H) London
5@ Bellefontaine
6@ North Union
7(H) Springfield Shawnee
8@ Benjamin Logan
9@ St. Paris Graham
10(H) Springfield Northwestern

NORTH UNION
1@ Pleasant
2(H) Liberty Union
3(H) Northmor
4(H) Jonathan Alder
5@ Urbana
6(H) Indian Lake
7@ Benjamin Logan
8@ Springfield Northwestern
9(H) Springfield Shawnee
10(H) St. Paris Graham

SPRINGFIELD NORTHWESTERN
1@ South Charleston Southeastern
2(H) Greenon
3@ Miami East
4(H) Tecumseh
5@ Kenton Ridge
6@ Springfield Shawnee
7@ St. Paris Graham
8(H) North Union
9(H) Benjamin Logan
10@ Indian Lake

ST. PARIS GRAHAM
1@ Kenton Ridge
2@ Milton-Union
3(H) Covington
4(H) Urbana
5@ London
6(H) Benjamin Logan
7(H) Springfield Northwestern
8@ Springfield Shawnee
9(H) Indian Lake
10@ North Union

URBANA
1@ Springfield Northeastern
2(H) Mechanicsburg
3(H) Benjamin Logan
4@ St. Paris Graham
5(H) North Union
6(H) London
7@ Jonathan Alder
8(H) Kenton Ridge
9@ Bellefontaine
10(H) Tecumseh
@redskinfbco92
 
Swap divisions for Shawnee and Urbana
It should be a sigh of relief that London has cycled out of the Braves schedule. However, Brookville and JA are going to be tough ones.

Does Delong stick with the Meeks' scheme or does he go back to his Wing-T roots. I would say week 3 will be interesting with Delong standing as a HC on the visitor side. I hope he breaks out with a black and gold tie for that game, lol.
 
It should be a sigh of relief that London has cycled out of the Braves schedule. However, Brookville and JA are going to be tough ones.

Does Delong stick with the Meeks' scheme or does he go back to his Wing-T roots. I would say week 3 will be interesting with Delong standing as a HC on the visitor side. I hope he breaks out with a black and gold tie for that game, lol.
IMO we end up with some kind of hybrid system.
 
Also think a lot depends on how many assistants are sticking around.
I hope they do. Though I wonder how many will be coming in from his past from Xenia and Tecumseh. That is the one thing I liked about the Meeks era, is the stability of the assistants. I know he had many come and go but the core maintained. If you have any insight, that would be good....

Hoping for a Chupacabra return to the playoffs....still a stout region.
 
I hope they do. Though I wonder how many will be coming in from his past from Xenia and Tecumseh. That is the one thing I liked about the Meeks era, is the stability of the assistants. I know he had many come and go but the core maintained. If you have any insight, that would be good....

Hoping for a Chupacabra return to the playoffs....still a stout region.
If I find anything out I will share. But for now, I know as much as anyone else.
 
Here are the crossover games starting in 2027:

Bellefontaine vs Indian Lake
Bethel vs Greenon
Jonathan Alder vs North Union
Kenton Ridge vs Ben Logan
London vs Shawnee
Tecumseh vs Northwestern
Urbana vs Graham

I wonder if these are permanent or if they will rotate?
 
Here are the crossover games starting in 2027:

Bellefontaine vs Indian Lake
Bethel vs Greenon
Jonathan Alder vs North Union
Kenton Ridge vs Ben Logan
London vs Shawnee
Tecumseh vs Northwestern
Urbana vs Graham

I wonder if these are permanent or if they will rotate?
I think history dictates they rotate every two years. I would have to believe Shawnee is happy as a clam to have London off the schedule for the next two years...but they got Alder
 
Top