I believe some of your questions were answered. There will not be a minimum of 8 games required if a team cannot get them.....and computer points are fairly easy to move around in Ohio.
Really - when were they answered? When did OHSAA clarify the "8 games against sanctioned opponents" rule?
Instead of using 100 as your divisor, use it as actual games played (80 for 8 games, etc). I'm not sure if you have ever taken the time to figure out the point system, but its fairly straight forward. Forfeits.....most likely another easy and universal fix. Don't count them as played.
The problem is OHSAA has been wildly inconsistent on "no contest" versus "forfeit" the past couple of seasons when a game is not played. Marion Elgin last year told Frankfort Adena last year that "we will not be playing because we do not have enough players to safely play", and OHSAA gave Adena the forfeit 'win' for that. In previous years, OHSAA has ruled those situations as "no contest." It ended up actually hurting Adena to be awarded the forfeit 'win', as Elgin went 0-10.
Further, there is still the controversy of a game-not-played being ruled a "no contest" late last season that is suggested to have impacted the final computer points rankings for Division V, Region 18... with the additional allegation thrown on the Yappi forums that the game was cancelled by the school as an underhanded attempt to shed the scheduled opponent's L2 impact. This is the Lutheran East vs Mathews controversy, where it had been alleged (but not substantiated) that Lutheran East intentionally cancelled on Mathews in order to improve the computer average as a 'win' against them would have lowered Lutheran East's average. LE ended up making the playoffs as a result of the averaging out. Whether LE actually did pull something seedy is its own topic, but the point being the above situations were the exact same thing with two different outcomes and OHSAA has demonstrated to be rather inconsistent on this lately.
Right now, there are still a lot of big questions on this topic. Teams don't know if the "an opponent has to be added by October 1 in order to count for computer rankings" rule will be amended in light of the uncertainty portending.