I’m not sure I understand your question, but if he doesn’t start a second dribble after the first one ends, there cannot be a violation for an illegal dribble.Is there any possible scenario where a player can catch the ball, take one dribble, and take a shot where the the player could have committed a double dribble?
I think you understood it perfectly. The kid took one dribble. He was whistled for double dribble.I’m not sure I understand your question, but if he doesn’t start a second dribble after the first one ends, there cannot be a violation for an illegal dribble.
And regarding the coach on the floor: “What you permit, you promote.” Unfortunately the officials that don’t handle business make things unnecessarily difficult for the ones that do.
I think he means he might not understand your motive, since those facts don't make it a double dribble. Did you see this? If so, are you perhaps biased as to the number of dribbles actually taken. Or perhaps did the player dribble, catch, and then fumble the ball to the floor and then catch it? Which might not be a dribble in your eyes?I think you understood it perfectly. The kid took one dribble. He was whistled for double dribble.
Nope. Clean catch, one two handed dribble, jump shot.I think he means he might not understand your motive, since those facts don't make it a double dribble. Did you see this? If so, are you perhaps biased as to the number of dribbles actually taken. Or perhaps did the player dribble, catch, and then fumble the ball to the floor and then catch it? Which might not be a dribble in your eyes?
one two handed dribble,
Heard this scenario while at a road game last week:
Following a timeout, Team A is to inbound the ball with 3.8 seconds left. The ball is inbounded and 2 dribbles are taken. However, the clock did not start when the ball was put into play by the inbounder. The officials' decision was to have Team A inbound the ball again from the same spot, but they also ordered the clock to be reset to 2 seconds. Was the situation handled correctly by the officials?
Another unusual but not impossible situation at a recent game:
Team A is at the foul line for 2 FTs. First FT is good. On the second FT, one player from both Team A and Team B entered the lane early. For what it's worth, it was unclear if either player entered the lane before the other (e.g. in the NFL when a defensive lineman's presnap movement induces an offensive linemen's movement presnap movement). Their movements appeared synchronized. The FT was made. The official called the lane violation, waved off the shot, and awarded Team B the ball out of bounds. How does one unravel this situation?
It's possible that the crew had definite knowledge that two seconds should have expired and they wanted the clock at 1.8, but they were dealing with an incompetent timer who didn't know how to put tenths on the game clock, so they rounded it off. That being said, I wasn't there, but it's amazing how many timers look at you like a deer-in-headlights when you ask them to put the clock at a specific tenth. It's happened to me multiple times.When the timer makes mistake or the clock malfunctions, time can only be adjusted when the officials have definite knowledge of the time that elapsed. This definite knowledge can be ascertained by normal officiating functions such as a visual count, a verbal count, a non-verbal count, etc...... ( on a non-verbal count, that official better be right )
One might argue (a strong argument, I might add) that removing 1.8 seconds is virtually impossible to be achieved through definite knowledge...... but this is why, for the most part, we don't engage in indepth discussions on specific plays here.
It's possible that the crew had definite knowledge that two seconds should have expired and they wanted the clock at 1.8, but they were dealing with an incompetent timer who didn't know how to put tenths on the game clock, so they rounded it off. That being said, I wasn't there, but it's amazing how many timers look at you like a deer-in-headlights when you ask them to put the clock at a specific tenth. It's happened to me multiple times.
Why wouldn't they reset to 3.8 seconds which makes the situation whole? Why should the inbounding team be penalized for a timer's error? I could see a situation where a home timer could advantage their team at the end of a game or quarter by not starting the clock.We could play what-if all day with any situation. That doesn't bode well for a good Q&A in a setting like this.
My answer was based on the original post indicating that the crew "ordered the clock to be reset to 2 seconds".
Why wouldn't they reset to 3.8 seconds which makes the situation whole? Why should the inbounding team be penalized for a timer's error? I could see a situation where a home timer could advantage their team at the end of a game or quarter by not starting the clock.
I get it. It might get complicated. So in the case above if in the ref's head 4 seconds had gone by then the game would be over. Mind you, this in a situation where the ref wasn't counting anything off. Or, if 5 seconds had actually gone off and a team scored the winning bucket, but the ref thought it felt like 3.5.Homer timers are very, very, very rare......
To answer the "why we don't reset?" question.............
What if there is a foul?
What if the team in possession violates then you see the clock has not started?
What if the team in possession scores?
What if the opponent steals the ball, scores, then we see the clock has not started?
That's why we don't "re-do" like they do in volleyball . Too many "what-if's" and potential exceptions to rules.
Or why stop the clock and take it out of bounds at all? Why not wait until the next dead ball and estimate the time. lol. Would really suck if a team is inbounding against pressure, gets it in, and then has to do it all over again. Don't envy you guys which is why I stick to playing and coaching.Homer timers are very, very, very rare......
To answer the "why we don't reset?" question.............
What if there is a foul?
What if the team in possession violates then you see the clock has not started?
What if the team in possession scores?
What if the opponent steals the ball, scores, then we see the clock has not started?
That's why we don't "re-do" like they do in volleyball . Too many "what-if's" and potential exceptions to rules.
I get it. It might get complicated. So in the case above if in the ref's head 4 seconds had gone by then the game would be over.
Mind you, this in a situation where the ref wasn't counting anything off.
Or why stop the clock and take it out of bounds at all? Why not wait until the next dead ball and estimate the time. lol. Would really suck if a team is inbounding against pressure, gets it in, and then has to do it all over again. Don't envy you guys which is why I stick to playing and coaching.
Would any referee here agree to work a varsity game involving the team from the town you live in? I’m referring mainly to one-school towns, not larger cities.
I don't know if this has been addressed or not (didn't feel like looking through 22 pages), but is there a rule on floor regulation for Junior High basketball?
The reason I ask is because I've seen most schools play on their HS court or a court HS regulation size, but every once and awhile you'll see a Junior High team play on an elementary size court. I saw one court not too long ago that was almost a square.
In football and volleyball, the field of play is the same for JH as it is for HS. Does basketball not require this?
There are no "required" dimensions under NFHS Rules. The Rules do provide that the "ideal" dimensions for games played under this rule code is 84 x 50. The number of schools that have floors smaller than this this is dwindling rapidly as those floors are inside older school buildings that are being replaced. Personally, I have yet to see a new school with a basketball floor smaller than the recommended 84 x 50.
As a side note, I have worked on junior high and youth ball (not for years) fields that are less than 120yd x 53 1/3yd... (something I have advocated for years at the lower levels)
AS12 have you officiated games that were played in a gym with something other than wood for a surface?
Player is fouled resulting in a 1 and 1 FT opportunity, prior to shooting the FT's the player who was fouled is assessed a technical foul, which is his 5th foul. Does he shoot the 1 and 1 or due to him picking up his 5th foul, does his sub shoot the 1 and 1?
2nd half of a game. Team A commits an intentional foul on Team B. Team B goes to shoot the free throws. Coach of team B is talking with all four others players on the same side of half court as the shooter is shooting his intentional ft. Are players allowed to be over half court or must the be on the other side?
Wait, but here on page 67 of the MSU rule book...There is no requirement for any of the other players to be behind the division line during free throws attempted due to an Intentional or Technical Foul. They must not, however be positioned along the free throw lane or on the court below the free throw line extended where the throws are being attempted.