In my mind Preble, Ansonia, and TV should love adding MU and Covington and going to 2 divisions (for football only. Stay one for everything else) They are getting nothing from some of the lopsided games they have. The same for Bradford, MissValley, and Dixie. The question becomes Arcanum, TCN, TVS, and Trail. They end up either being the weakest football school (very subjective here, but I think you get the argument) in the big division, or the top of the heap in a much weaker division. Is a division of TCN, TVS, Covington, Dixie, Bradford, and Mississinawa desirable for those schools or not? 2 crossovers would keep some better competition on the schedule, but you could give the weaker small division teams games against the weaker big division teams and stronger vs stronger if you wanted.
Every school votes for their own best interest. So look at these divisions, and tell me who is a "yes" vote and who is a "no" vote:
Preble-Arcanum-TriV-Ansonia-Trail-MU
TVS-TCN-Dixie-Bradford-MissValley-Covington
(MU and Covington not in bold because they don't get a vote)
I like the flexibility. If Covington returns to glory, you could trade them with someone (Trail?).
Add in the fact that going from one to three out-of-conference games gives teams flexibility to schedule harder or easier depending on where each program is.
My guess is the football schools vote 10-2 or 9-3 for expansion? No idea what FM and Newton would think.