You sure you don't mean if the Vikings can't run the football they are toast? Lol.If 49ers can't run the football their toast IMO.
NO Vikings IMO have a better passing attack than 49ers. SF o - line is the difference, plus they have a good defense. Mixon or Chubb had that o - line they both would rush for 2000 yds.You sure you don't mean if the Vikings can't run the football they are toast? Lol.
Wow I have to disagree. Niners have more weapons on offense, with more speed . Plus Kittle at TENO Vikings IMO have a better passing attack than 49ers. SF o - line is the difference, plus they have a good defense. Mixon or Chubb had that o - line they both would rush for 2000 yds.
NO Vikings IMO have a better passing attack than 49ers. SF o - line is the difference, plus they have a good defense. Mixon or Chubb had that o - line they both would rush for 2000 yds.
I am not a big Jimmy G. fan. A lot of NFL starting QB's would look good with that line. But to beat SF a team needs to make Jimmy G. beat them.Wow I have to disagree. Niners have more weapons on offense, with more speed . Plus Kittle at TE
I agree that Jimmy G. is not one of the best QB's in the league, but the 49ers, have so much talent on their team, it opens him up for decent successI am not a big Jimmy G. fan. A lot of NFL starting QB's would look good with that line. But to beat SF a team needs to make Jimmy G. beat them.
LolYou sure you
You sure you don't mean if the Vikings can't run the football they are toast? Lol.
This aged well.NO Vikings IMO have a better passing attack than 49ers. SF o - line is the difference, plus they have a good defense. Mixon or Chubb had that o - line they both would rush for 2000 yds.
49ers win with their running game and the 49ers were just better overall team. But my overall point was if you shut down 49ers running game they will have a hard time winning.This aged well.