A parent in NorCal last week wrote a short piece in comparing the GDA with the ECNL and high school soccer:
Comparing Girls’ Development Academy with ECNL and High School Soccer
There's really not much earth shattering in what he writes. I agree with a lot of what he writes and disagree with some as well. His main points, for those that don't want to take a few minutes to read it:
GDA = Primarily Player Development – no financial incentives, just longer-term player development owned and organized by our national soccer federation. Strong centralized control over all aspects, including coaching standards, curriculum, training and game schedule.
ECNL = Primarily Business – a league for our pay-to-play clubs to compete against each other. Need to ‘win’ to keep and attract paying parents with talented girls. Clubs and coaches retain, for all practical intents and purposes, full independence.
High School Soccer = Primarily Social – girls enjoy playing with school friends for their school and get local peer group recognition. Focus is on ‘winning’ with the available pool of players at the school, not player development. Risk of injury is high.
The author contends that the current ECNL and college path simply doesn’t work if world-class player development is the goal. I contend that world-class player development is the goal of a very small fraction of those that play.
The author sites a quote from April Heinrichs who often do not agree with but do agree with here:
“When people say the gap is closing, I would say the gap has closed and we’re falling behind in these areas.” – April Heinrichs in NYT interview, June 2015